Federal law doesnt mandate it
Answer:
he Problem with the Justice Department It’s a building full of prosecutors. Mark Osler. Imagine an incoming president of the United States announcing that he or she would take advice on criminal justice matters exclusively from a Federal Defender’s office.
Explanation:
thats what you need ?
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Evidences that have been analyzed in violation to the right of a defendant can't be used or presented in the court of law, just like the option states ,it has violated the rights and according to the law should not be used in presenting a case to the judge , so option B best explains what the exclusionary rules states.
I believe the answer is: broken glass.
This proof that the grouping/representing process of a certain events or objects. This process usually resulted in the creation of words or actions that would ignite other memory due to its relevance. (in the example above, it's the word 'smahed' and actual broken glass.<span />
