In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
I’m sure it true i’m not very sure
Both have the right to own property, bear arms, and freedom of religion
Answer: Disbarment
Explanation:
Disbarment is known to be the procedure through which the right of an attorney to practice law and act as a lawyer is withdrawn from him as a result of illegitimate and unprincipled practices which are not in conformity with the rules of the profession. Thus, his license can be officially taken or removed from him due to misuse of office, deception, drug abuse and so on.
The claim that defining members of some minority as inferior will make them inferior is one application of
the Thomas theorem This theory is one of the most well-known and utilized theories in sociology. According Thomas theory individuals make decisions in situations based on their interpretation of the situation.
