Yo Mf leave this page right now nobody cares abot your questions
Answer:
increases
higher
more
lower
lower
Explanation:
If the money supply is increased. individuals would have more money and consumption would increase. Increase in consumption would lead to a rise in demand.
when demand exceeds supply, prices rise,
When there is a rise in price, it encourages producers to increase production in order to increase their profit margin.
In order to expand production, more factors of production would be needed. So, more labour would be hired. thus, unemployment would fall.
it can be seen that higher inflation lowers unemployment
Answer:
Final Value= $61,037.04
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Investment= $2,378 in a bank at the end of every year for 10 years.
The company makes no deposits during the subsequent 5 years.
Interest rate= 10%
First, we need to calculate the first 10 years.
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {2,378*[(1.1^10)-1]} / 0.1
FV= $37,899.20
Now, the 5 years:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 37,899.2*(1.1^5)
FV= $61,037.04
A rental inventory is basically like people rent you things. Cars, and lots of stuff. its a good idea to have a rental inventory because you can rent people things in a business.
Answer:
D. Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis.
Explanation:
Under factors of production, we have Land ,labour ,capital and entrepreneur.
Labour are the prime movers of a business.If a new CEO with a good track record has been employed, then the value of the company will increase.
Technically, that Quadrangle Company has increased its production(which might mean that the goods and services they deliver to their clients has increased or the mode of delivery of services has been improved upon), the value is also meant to increase.
With all these indices in place, fundamental analysis will now show that the corperation is undervalued. so D
Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis
perfectly fits the answer