Answer:
In general, the higher the total asset turnover and the lower the capital intensity ratio, the more efficient the overall asset management of the firm will be.
Explanation:
Asset Turnover = Net Sales / Total Asset
Capital Intensity = Total Asset / Net Sales
According to the above formulas most efficient situation will be to increase the asset turnover and decrease the capital intesity ratio because they are reciprocal to each other, so thses will behave inversly with each other. Higher turnover means the higher sales using total asset and lower capital intensity ratio means asset are lower timesto the net sales which is an efficient use of asset.
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
The aggregate demand in an economy comprises of consumer spending, government spending, investment expenditure, and net exports.
An increase in any of these components will cause the aggregate demand to increase or decrease.
So when the government spending increases the aggregate demand will increase. This increase in the aggregate demand will cause the aggregate demand curve to shift to the right.
This rightward shift in the aggregate demand curve will cause the price level and equilibrium quantity to increase.
The kind of measures that Bill took which made his insurance premiums to drop is a preventative measure.
<h3>What is a
preventative measure?</h3>
In insurance, a preventative measure can be defined as a kind of measure that typically involves reducing the degree of risk associated with an insurance object, and mitigating (decreasing) the negative impact of potential insurance-related accidents on the insured.
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that the kind of measures that Bill took which made his insurance premiums to drop is a preventative measure.
Read more on insurance here: brainly.com/question/16789837
#SPJ1
The answer you are looking for is C. meet the needs and wants of the customer.
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.