Answer:
3. net income is understated by $175
Explanation:
There were two transactions omitted. The first transaction is unearned rent revenue of which $450 was earned. This earned rent revenue increases income by $450. While the second transaction was accrued interest payable of which $275 is owed. This interest payable increases liabilities by $275.
Therefore, from the above, income or revenue is understated by $450, while expenses is understated by $275.
Therefore, net income is understated by income less expenses, thus 450 - 275 = $175. This also implies that liabilities are overstated by $175.
The sales goals. That's it
Answer:
August 2 Notes Receivable 8000 Dr
Accounts Receivable- Ryan 8000 Cr
October 30 Interest receivable 220 Dr
Interest Revenue 220 Cr
October 31 Cash 8220 Dr
Notes Receivable 8000 Cr
Interest Receivable 220 Cr
Explanation:
When we receive the Note against the Accounts Receivable, we will credit the Accounts Receivable to close the account of Ryan and create a new current asset account of Notes Receivable on August 2.
On October 30, 90 days period of Note is complete so we will record the interest that is receivable for us on this note.
- Interest Receivable = 8000 * 11% * 90/360 = $220
We record this as Interest Receivable as we have not received this and credit Interest revenue as it is our income.
On 31 October, when we receive cash it will be total of Notes payable and Interest so we will debit cash by 8220 and credit the Notes payable and interest receivable.
Answer:
4.20%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the Rate formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $1,150
Future value = $1,067.50
Assuming Par value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 6.35% = $63.50
NPER = 5 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the rate of return is 4.20%
Answer:
c. measures changes in quantity demanded more accurately than elasticity.
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, slope measures changes in quantity demanded very accurately compared to elasticity. The main for this reason is that m, slope and elasticity are not the same concepts. Slope evaluates the
flatness or steepness of a line in terms of the evaluating units for price and quantity, while elasticity evaluates the relative response of quantity to changes in price.