The requirement of Kameron, Candice, and Leo should be for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
The information related to the pledged asset is as follows:
- A pledged asset is a valuable possession that could be transferred to the lender in order to secure the debt or a loan.
- The pledged asset should be considered as collateral that could be held by a lender and in return, it is for lending the funds.
- Also, it can decrease the down payment that should be needed for the loan along with this if there is any change in the interest rate so the same should be decreased.
Therefore we can conclude that, the requirement done by these three people is needed for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
Learn more about the LLC here: brainly.com/question/1214636
One for just regular card usage, one for savings and one for emergencies.
This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
Answer:
B) must be balanced by a statement that trading options can also result in significant losses.
Explanation:
Representatives do not trade securities by themselves, they only enter orders on behalf of their clients and following their clients' orders. That means that the clients assume the risk of losing money due to a bad investment. The clients are also the ones that benefit the most since it is their money being invested. Any statement that states the possibility of significant earnings, must also include the possibility of significant losses.
Answer:
c. $18,000, with $27,000 carried forward to 2020.
Explanation:
Non-business bad debts are accounted as short-term capital losses. Short-term and long-term capital gains may be offset by short-term capital losses. Ellen may offset $15,000 of her $45,000 bad debt from Nicole against the $15,000 capital gain from the sale of stock.
In addition, Ellen may claim up to the annual limitation amount of $3,000 in short-term capital losses. In total, $18,000 of the bad debt can be claimed as a capital loss in the current year with $27,000 in unused short-term capital losses carried forward.
