Answer:
$3.75
Explanation:
As we already know that
Direct materials quantity variance = (Budged pounds of direct material - Actual pounds of direct material) × Standard rate
$1,500 unfavorable = (4,400 pounds - 4,800 pounds) × Standard rate
$1,500 unfavorable = 400 × Standard rate
So, standard rate is
= $1,500 ÷ $400
= $3.75
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
The current ratio is 1.18 times
Explanation:
Current Ratio: The current ratio is that ratio which shows a relationship between the current assets and the current liabilities
The computation of the current ratio is shown below
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
where,
Total current assets = Cash + short-term investments + net accounts receivable + merchandise inventory
= $43,500 + $27,000 + $102,000 + $125,000
= $297,500
And, the total current liabilities is $251,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $297,500 ÷ $251,000
= 1.18 times
The long term note payable is not a current liabilities,hence it is not considered in the computation part.
Complete question:
On January 1. Year 1. White Co. sold a property with a remaining useful life of 20 years to Blue Co. for $900.000. At the same time. White entered into a contract with Blue for the right to use the property (leaseback) for a period of 6 years. with annual rental payments of 580.000 that approximate the market rental payments for similar properties. On January 1. Year 1. the carrying amount of the property was 5680.000. and its fair value was 5770.000. A discount rate for the lease of 10% is used by both White and Blue. The present value factor for an ordinary annuity at 10% for 6 periods is 4.3553. The lease does not transfer the property to White at the end of the lease term and does not include a purchase option.
What amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1 ?
A. $0
B. $130,000
C. $90,000
D. $220,000
Answer:
$90,000 amount of lease expense for the right of use of the property is recognised by White in Year 1
Explanation:
If the leaseback is known as an operating lease, the original transition to the buyer-lessor of the asset should be taken into account as the selling of an asset, given that all the income identification requirements have been fulfilled.
If the deal is of equal value, the lender lease is informed of the gain or loss of sale between the purchase price and the sum of the land that is held. Yet this is not a equal value trade. The property's sale price is higher than its market value. Accordingly, the income or loss on sale seems to be the difference between the equal worth and the value of the land.
Therefore, on 1 January, White records a benefit of $90,000 in revenue of $770,000 (fair value of $680,000 in carrying amounts)
