1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulijaS [17]
4 years ago
8

Orson takes harrison's car without harrison's permission and without just cause. orson has probably committed the tort of conver

sion unless he can show that:
Business
1 answer:
Verdich [7]4 years ago
3 0

Orson has probably committed the tort of conversion unless he can show that <u>"Harrison does not really own the car."</u>


Conversion is an intentional tort comprising of taking with the goal of practicing over the property a proprietorship conflicting with the genuine proprietor's privilege of possession". In the United Kingdom, it is a tort of strict liability. Its counterparts in criminal law incorporate robbery or burglary and criminal change. In those wards that remember it, criminal transformation is a lesser wrongdoing than burglary/theft.

You might be interested in
In contrast to __________ interactions, which allow the firm to gain insights on the needs of a particular customer, ___________
Reika [66]

Answer:

A. prosumer; crowdsourcing

Explanation:

Prosumers are people who both produce and consume goods and services. Communities are made of of people who co-create goods, and so are independent of external communities in meeting their needs.

Crowdsourcing is a growing way of working which involves duties being open to a large number of people. The advantage is that there is a large pool of talent to solve problems and accomplish jobs.

3 0
3 years ago
Consider a two-period resource allocation problem where the efficient allocation of the resource implies a market price of $10 i
RideAnS [48]

Answer:

$10.80

Explanation:

Given that:

A first-period efficient allocation cost = $10

The constant marginal extraction cost  MEC for both periods = $2

The social discount rate (r) = 10%

∴

The efficient undiscounted market price for the 2nd period can be determined by using the formula:

P_1 - MEC_1 = \dfrac{P_2 -MEC_2}{1+r} \\ \\  \implies 10 -2 = \dfrac{P_2-2}{1+0.1} \\ \\ 8 = \dfrac{P_2-2}{1.1} \\ \\ P_2 -2 = 8 \times 1.1 \\ \\ P_2-2=8.8 \\ \\ P_2 = 8.8+2 \\ \\ \mathbf{P_2 = \$10.80}

3 0
3 years ago
"In the corn market, demand often exceeds supply and supply sometimes exceeds demand." "The price of corn rises and falls in res
alexandr402 [8]

Answer: In the second statement

Explanation: Supply and demand are two market forces which determines the price of a commodity. In simple words, the amount of commodity that the consumers are willing to buy at a given price is called demand and the producer are willing to sell is called supply. The situation in which the two are equal is called equilibrium.

If the demand for a product is higher than its supply then its price will increase and vice versa.

Thus, from the above we can conclude that the second statement is correct.

3 0
4 years ago
(Lessee-Lessor Entries, Sales-Type Lease; Guaranteed Residual Value) Phelps Company leases a building to Walsh, Inc. on January
Artist 52 [7]

<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>

Calculation of Minimum lease annual payments from (MLP)    

Year  MLP from lessor       Present value                   Present valur of

                  point of view    factor 8%                    cash flows

1                  $4,703                  1 /(1.08)=0925   $4,350.28

2                    $4,703                  1 /(1.08)^{\wedge} 2=0.857 $4,030.47

3                   $4,703               1 /(1.08)^{\wedge} 3=0.793  $3,729.48

4                 $4,703               1 /(1.08)^{\wedge} 4=0.735  $3,456.71

5                   $4,703              1 /(1.08)^{\wedge} 5=0.680  $3,198.04

   

Total of Minimum

lease Payments  $23,515                                       $ 18,764.97

Add    

Unguaranteed

residual value(ugrv)  4000  1 /(1.08)^{\wedge 5}=0.680  $2,720.00

Asset to be recorded

in the books of lessor

(sum of mlp +ugrv)  $27,515                             $ 21,484.97

Here        

Gross Investment=$27515        

Lease receivable recorded in in the books of lessor(Phelps)(Mimum lease payments + Unguaranteed residual )value = $21484  $21,484      

Walsh (lessee) shoiuld be recorded the amount of present value of minimum lease payments + Guaranteed Residual value=$18764.97 as asset and liabilty            

b) In the books of phelps (lessor)        

2017.01.01  Lease Recievble from walsh ….Dr  $21,484      

                                 to Asset                              $21,484      

(Being Lease receivable recorded )        

In the books of Walsh (lessee)        

2017.01.01  Asset ac ……………Dr  $18,764        

         to Lease Liabilty(Lessor)               $18,764      

(Being the asset and liabilty recorded )                

2017.12.31  Depreciation ……Dr  3752        

                            to Asset                      3752        

(Beint Depreciation recorded charged during the year recorded 18764/5 provided for 5 years)

Here annual payment started from the at the beginning of year i.e annual lease payments start from 01.01.2018.

c)  If expected residual value of $4000 is guaranteed by walsh no changes will be made in classification of lease and there is no chages in asset recorded in Lessor books. But changes will be made in the books of lessee as present value of guaranteed residual value should be added to asset I.e $18764+Present vlue of $4000     $18764+2720=21484

d)   If expected residual value of $3000 is guaranteed by walsh no changes will be made in classification of lease and there is no chages in asset recorded in Lessor books But changes will be made in the books of lessee as present value of guaranteed residual value should be added to asset    I.e $18764+Present vlue of $3000       $18764+$2040=$20804

 

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose you win the lottery and have two options: A. Take $1 million now. B. Take $1.2 million to be paid out as 300,000 now and
laila [671]

Answer:

A. Take $1 million now.

Explanation:

A. If we take $1 million now the present value of the money is $1 million.

B. If we choose to take $1.2 million paid out over 3 years then present value will at 10% will be;

$300,000 + $300,000 / 1.2 + $300,000/ 1.44 + $300,000 / 1.728

$300,000 + $250,000 + $208,000+ $173,611 = $931,944

The present value of option B is less than present value of option A. We should select option A and take $1 million now.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • . Calculating Cost of Preferred Stock: Holdup Bank has an issue of preferred stock with a $3.75 stated dividend that just sold f
    7·1 answer
  • Robert has a list of characteristics that he wants his new house to have, and he has listed every item in that list in their ord
    8·1 answer
  • Barton Corporation acquires a coal mine at a cost of $1,500,000. Intangible development costs total $360,000. After extraction h
    7·1 answer
  • The organizational-management process consists of seven steps: (1) doing research, (2) establishing the mission and vision, (3)
    5·1 answer
  • How will thinking on the margin help increase the chance of long-term success for your business, even if additional competition
    6·3 answers
  • Which employee in the Business, Management, and Administration career cluster would most likely work in a cubicle?
    13·2 answers
  • The idea of rational expectations suggests that :_________
    11·1 answer
  • The current economy is strong and many people are feeling confident about their future and ability to pay off debt. Because of t
    11·1 answer
  • Royce Co. acquired 60% of Park Co. for $420,000 on December 31, 2019 when Park's book value was $560,000. The Royce stock was no
    10·1 answer
  • Bodacious Corporation produced 100 units of Product AA. The total standard and actual costs for materials and direct labor for t
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!