1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paladinen [302]
2 years ago
5

The supreme court ruled in bureau v. mcdowell that _____________ apply/applies only to the actions of government agents and not

to those of private citizens or private security employees.
History
1 answer:
Gnoma [55]2 years ago
7 0
Unlawful search and seizure, the Supreme Court Ruling found that incriminating materials given to government representatives by private citizens or employees do not have the same rules regarding lawful search and seizure. For example, if someone provides incriminating documents that were procured without a search warrant and that someone is a private citizen, these documents are admissible in court and not subject to the same search and seizure laws as if they were being collected by a police officer. 
You might be interested in
why did de Rubi choose to concentrate on protecting the land South of the Border line instead of trying to extend protection to
Alex73 [517]

Answer:  he chose to gift the french

Explanation:

i took the journal quiz

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Germany do to Rhineland? And why?
Finger [1]
Germany<span> claimed the treaty was hostile to them and Hitler used this as an excuse to send German troops into the </span>Rhineland<span> in March 1936, contrary to the terms of the treaties of Versailles and Locarno.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Who did lincoln send home after the battle of antieman for failing to go after the confederate army
Sveta_85 [38]
George McClellanfailed to Perdue Lee’s army at Antietam, MD
7 0
3 years ago
Some of the delegates to the Convention said that they were exceeding their authority in writing the Constitution. Why did they
qaws [65]
The correct answer here would be C. The usual story goes that Confederation Congress only assigned them to propose the amendments to the Articles but instead they created an entirely new document. This is their reason, among others but none of them are correct as the Convention did not exceed its authority. The Confederation Congress for one was not a government in the true sense of the word. It was more an alliance like NATO. The convention was a also a meeting about just more than the Articles. The convention was beyond the Congress and its opinion was nothing more than that, just an opinion. Furthermore all 13 states ratified the Constitution. So no the Convention did not exceed its authority.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were people loyal to great britian during the americican reveloutuion
Anna71 [15]
Because of what they had to offer
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!
    7·1 answer
  • In the mock-up of an airplane cabin, there were heated yellow bags where people would normally sit. why?
    6·1 answer
  • How did geography affect the economy of the three colonies answer?
    12·1 answer
  • The fourteenth amendment was written to protect african americans from laws that tried to take away their rights true or false
    14·1 answer
  • Historians label an event as a turning point when it what
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes the legislative setbacks Franklin Roosevelt encountered during his first two terms?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the clear and present danger principle that justice holmes enunciated in the schenck decision
    8·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP please I have no idea so can you please help me
    11·1 answer
  • Marina is using a metal spoon to stir her hot soup. Why does the spoon feel warm?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be considered an early version of a settler colony? A. Italy B. Germany C. Great Britain D. the ori
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!