1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
14

The Relationship Between Thoughts, Feelings and Behaviors

English
2 answers:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h2>This is also known as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy – simplified.</h2>

dusya [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Simply put, a situation arises, and we have thoughts about the facts of that situation; those thoughts trigger feelings, and based on those feelings we engage in behaviors which in turn impact the situation (either positively or negatively), and the cycle continues.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Question 2
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Hissed

Explanation:

A verb is a doing word, and hissed is the only doing word.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the reading, which position aboard a steamboat paid the most?
AysviL [449]
It says in your reading, so for someone to answer that we need to know the reading material.
6 0
3 years ago
What does probability have to do with heredity?
navik [9.2K]
The concept of heredity is that genes are not randomly passed down. Well, technically they are but we use punett squares to predict the chances of passing certain traits. Because virtually all traits that are dominant are more common than recessive ones, and because all genes are not passed in a completely random way, it is not just pure chance, but calculated chance by which we can predict the probability of what genes are passed down. Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
nfer In the first letter from Margaret to her husband, she explains her conversation with Barow, one of Lord Moleyns’ men. What
noname [10]

Answer:

she still have the relationship with Barow ,she still loves him

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whose epithet is god of the sea-blue mane?
    12·1 answer
  • How can popular music persuade a young audience
    5·2 answers
  • They..... (take) some papers last night
    5·2 answers
  • Instructions:Select the correct text in the passage.
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone please answer this question
    10·2 answers
  • 11. Identify the conjunction in the following sentence
    11·1 answer
  • Give the 7 Examples of folk songs<br>and Give seven Epics.​
    10·1 answer
  • At the top of the winding and twisting mountain trail sat the Hall of the Downfall. It was once beautiful and shone like a star,
    13·1 answer
  • What is the difference between main details and supporting details of a piece of writing
    6·2 answers
  • How does the quote "character is what you are in the dark" related to romeo and juliet
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!