Ways that Neo-Freudian theorists differ from Freud include:
- B) Sex is emphasized less by neo-Freudians.
- C) Conscious processes are emphasized more by neo-Freudians.
- D) They emphasize interpersonal relationships as the source of psychological health
<h3>How do Neo-Freudian theorists differ from Freud?</h3>
Even though they support a lot of Freud's theories, Neo-Freudian theorists often disagree with some of the former's assertions.
They for instance, do not place as much emphasis on sex and try to focus on interpersonal relationships being a source of psychological health.
Options for this question include:
- A) They rely on a more scientific approach than did Freud.
- B) Sex is emphasized less by neo-Freudians.
- C) Conscious processes are emphasized more by neo-Freudians.
- D) They emphasize interpersonal relationships as the source of psychological health.
Find out more on Neo-Freudian theorists at brainly.com/question/6314134
#SPJ1
Answer:
20.40%
Explanation:
According to CAPM :
expected rate of return = risk free rate + (beta x market rate of return)
6% + (1.2 x 12%) = 20.40%
Answer: A -Raoul asks Wendy if she would be willing to sell her first-edition copy of War and Peace.
Explanation: An offer is a legal term used in a contract. An offer is made by an intending buyer to an intending seller regarding a product or service.
The offer is a legal question that is asked by a willing buyer if the seller of the product would consider selling it or not.
An offer can be accepted or declined by the person being made the offer.
Answer: C
Explanation:
This is because although the coupon rate is devoid of federal income tax any market discount is taxed as interest income earned. So so if there is a way that they can be taxed without jeopardizing their basic Federal income tax-free status, why not? The discount can be accreted annually and tax paid, or the tax can be paid at maturity or sale date.
Answer:
$80 million
Explanation:
We know that
Multiplier = (1) ÷ (1 - marginal propensity to consume)
= (1) ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= (1) ÷ (0.25)
= 4
Now the GDP would increase by
= Increase in Investment spending × multiplier effect
= $20 billion × 4
= $80 million increase
We simply multiplied the investment spending increase with the multiplier effect
