Answer:
this is your answer look it once.
Simply because 4.135 is a larger number than 4.23.
They are about 400cm long just make sure u put that
Answer:
C) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
Explanation:
The following multiple choice responses are provided to complete the question:
A) The Pearson correlation results should be reported because it shows a stronger correlation with a smaller p-value (more significant).
B) The Pearson correlation results should be reported because the two variables are normally distributed.
C) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
D) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because the p-value is closer to 0.0556.
Further Explanation:
A count variable is discrete because it consists of non-negative integers. The number of polyps variable is therefore a count variable and will most likely not be normally distributed. Normality of variables is one of the assumptions required to use Pearson correlation, however, Spearman's correlation does not rest upon an assumption of normality. Therefore, the Spearman correlation would be more appropriate to report because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
Answer:
9.694 years
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the investment is $P.
So, we are asked to determine the time it will grow to triple with the compound interest rate of 12%.
Let the time is y years.
So, from the formula of compound interest we can write
⇒ 
⇒ 
Now, taking log both sides we get,
y log 1.12 = log 3 {Since, 
}
⇒ 0.04922y = 0.477712
⇒ y = 9.694 years (Answer)
