Well, I am not really good at writing, you know. But I know who will be able to help you with it. Personally, I use the help of Supreme essay guys. They usually both proofread and edit my papers. Those guys are real professionals in what they do. Good luck!
Though Brutus’ speech was logical and concise and he thought that the crowd would rally to his cause, he failed to gain. Brutus was demanded the people to listen hear him. He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations. He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause. The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd.Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him. His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said. Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion. As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over. Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts.<span>
</span>
The answer is c. games. Games is the object of the verb. What did they lose? They lost games.
Hope that helped you.
Answer:
C. under the shade of the single oak tree.
Explanation:
under is a prepositional phrase. the words “and” & “while” aren’t prepositional phrases.
