Answer:
This statement can be justified giving the following arguments.
When citizens show their dissatisfaction, it clearly shows that they are actively taking part in democratic projects, because this system is their own.
A public expression of dissatisfaction shows that people are not just forcefully following or agreeing with whatever they are told.
It shows that they are enjoying their freedom and hence they are no more subjects but are responsible citizens.
Their freedom and transformation from the status of subjects to that of citizens is the main aim of democracy.
As people get benefits, they ask for more. This makes democracy better
Explanation:
Answer: Some benefits of lacrosse game include Teamwork Building, full, body workout, endurance, field strategy and vision, discipline.
Explanation:
Dear Parent,
Trust your day went fine?
We want to enlighten you on the benefits of lacrosse game. Lacrosse is a team sport played with a lacrosse stick and a lacrosse ball. Below are some ways your children could benefit from playing them;
- Full body workout; it helps the body to be fully worked out, every section of the body participates in this
- Teamwork building; it encourages working with team members, hereby improving socialization
- Endurance; it encourages endurance, which could be beneficial when working with people
- Field strategy and vision; it builds strategy and vision within the individual
- Discipline; and makes them discipline in whatever they find themselves doing.
They can learn more about the sport but joining the lacrosse sport club, they would really enjoy their time there. We look forward to seeing them in the club.
Kind regards.
Answer:
Yes she can recover damages for her emotional distress
Explanation:
The local mechanics negligence while repairing the mower is a reckless which caused the injury to the son and indirectly affecting the mother emotionally because of fear cause by injury o the son, so under common law which allows for individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual due to his recklessness.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
