Answer:
reflecting to the Laws of Table I of the Twelve tables by ancient Rome, i think the one that still applicable is :
Law I
Which force someone to attend the court when he/she is summoned
Law V
Which allow someone to be represented by a lawyer in court
Law VII
Which allow two people in disputes to made a settlement and end the battle in court
Explanation:
hope this helps!!
Answer:
La respuesta es la D.
Explanation:
Decimos que la respuesta es la D, es decir la palabra llama,porque esta palabra sin cambiar en ninguna de sus sílabas ,tiene varios significados.Por ejemplo la palabra llama puede significar fuego,también la palabra llama tambien se puede referir a un animal mamífero que habita en algunas países que hacen parte de la región andina como colombia,argentina,ecuador.
Answer:the UN victories in the northern peninsula....
Explanation:maybe
Answer:
This procedure is know as:
D. known-groups paradigm.
Explanation:
Dr. Sheffield already knows the traits of each of the two groups - the gamblers and the alcoholics. What he is doing is establishing the validity of his measure by applying it to a group that has a certain trait - the gamblers - and to a group that does not have a certain trait - the alcoholics. This procedure is an example of known-groups paradigm. It is important to note that this type of procedure can also be applied to two groups that do possess the same trait, but with the purpose to verify which one will score higher on it.
If the Ferrets should go ahead to sign the young players they would be making a trade off between the superstar that can win the league and the 3 players.
<h3>What is a trade-off?</h3>
A trade off can be described to be the sacrifices that are made when a person decides to forego buying a good in order to purchase another good.
The team here would be foregoing having a superstar that can help them win the league for the three players that they went on to sign.
Read more on tradeoffs here:
brainly.com/question/13760478