Get a job then pay
Happy to Help
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Answer: (-∞, 0)The graph of the parent absolute value function is decreasing over the interval (–∞, 0)
The graph drawn for the absolute value parent function is usually made up of two linear "pieces" which meet at a common vertex (the origin; 0, 0). The graph is symmetric around the y axis and generally takes a V shape or an inverted V shape. The absolute/relative minimum of the graph is 0 but there it has no absolute maximum; so the absolute maximum is usually represented by ‘∞’ (infinitive). Typically, the graph of the parent absolute value function is increasing over the interval (0, ∞), and is decreasing over the interval (-∞, 0).
You have to multiply how many pounds Jake can carry and how many pounds Jake's dad can carry.
Answer:
Fredholm's integral equations of the first kind are the prototypical example of ill-posed linear inverse problems. The model, among other things, reconstruction of distorted noisy observations and indirect density estimation and also appear in instrumental variable regression. However, their numerical solution remains a challenging problem. Many techniques currently available require a preliminary discretization of the domain of the solution and make strong assumptions about its regularity. For example, the popular expectation-maximization smoothing (EMS) scheme requires the assumption of piecewise constant solutions which is inappropriate for most applications. We propose here a novel particle method that circumvents these two issues. This algorithm can be thought of as a Monte Carlo approximation of the EMS scheme which not only performs an adaptive stochastic discretization of the domain but also results in smooth approximate solutions. We analyze the theoretical properties of the EMS iteration and of the corresponding particle algorithm. Compared to standard EMS, we show experimentally that our novel particle method provides state-of-the-art performance for realistic systems, including motion deblurring and reconstruction of cross-section images of the brain from positron emission tomography.
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply 2^(-5) by 2^6. The correct result is 2^1, or just 2 (inches).
