Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer: During WWI, tobacco and cotton were two of the most common crops in most of the southern states. Cotton and tobacco were always in high demand, and the income, along with victory bonds, brought funding for the war.
Hope this helps!
Good Luck,
LaciaMelodi :3
Answer:
Steppe nomads would invade the settled communities to take control of pasture lands. Settled communities were in the fear of new or next invasion. The nomad's trade was not related to the gain but related to the goods provided themselves that they don't have that time Nomads were from two different cultures and districts.
Nomads speak a Turkic language. There were many nomads group who traveled on the silk road.
Philip is exhibiting adolescent egocentrism.
Egocentrism is a characteristic of very young children, however, it can continue into adolescence as well, as is the case with Philip in this case. He cannot put himself in other people's shoes because he is experiencing pain and believes that no one else has ever experienced that as well. He thinks no one can understand him which is a classic example of egocentrism - focusing on oneself.
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
