1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
11

The purpose of the new mandatory discovery provisions is to: a. remove the element of surprise from litigation. b. make litigati

on more of a quest for the truth. c. minimize discovery times and costs. d. All of the above are reasons mandatory discovery was adopted.
Law
1 answer:
Lorico [155]3 years ago
8 0

<u>The purpose of the new mandatory discovery provisions is to: remove the element of surprise from litigation. make litigation more of a quest for the truth. minimize discovery times and costs</u>

Explanation:

<u>Discovery </u>refers to the process of exchanging the information between the parties involved in a trial.The prosecution and the defense build their respective cases based on the evidences available.The information exchanged includes

  • Physical evidences
  • Witness statement
  • Police interrogation data
  • List of the witnesses

The biggest change to the Discovery provision is

  • Earlier the defense has to file a written request to obtain the evidences and also no time frame was set to provide the evidences to the defense.So in many cases the prosecutor used to keep the evidences in their custody till the eve of the trial.
  • But as per the new discovery provision,the prosecutor has to provide the defense all the information/evidences within 15 days of the arrangement.The time frame can be extended to 30 days in case the evidence for the trial is large,or the prosecutor does not have evidence in their possession.

The answer is (D) all of the above

You might be interested in
Opinions and ideas are usually stronger arguments than the Constitution and previous Supreme Court decisions.
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

No the Constitution  and Supreme Court are stronger than an opinion

Explanation:

If the constitution says something that's what goes, a judge can't just decide to put someone in prison because they killed someone in self-defense, because that's not what the Constitution says.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What ultimately prompted parliament to repeal the townshend acts?.
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

The Boston Massacre shocked Parliament into repealing the acts. would be regained by Napoleon and sold to the third president of the United States, Thomas Jefferson.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Llllllll j i(hbibihbihbi(bihbi(Hibbing hbuhb
ASHA 777 [7]
Shawtys like a melody in my head that i can’t ‍♂️ keep out got me singing like na na na na everyday
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Một hành vi có thể đồng thời là vi phạm pháp luật hình sự vừa là vi phạm pháp luật hành chính, nhưng không thể đồng thời vừa là
Naily [24]

Câu trả lời là có. Nhiều phiên tòa có thể vừa dân sự vừa hình sự. Ví dụ, một người cố ý giết người khác có thể bị buộc tội giết người tại tòa án hình sự và cũng có thể bị kiện dân sự về tội chết oan.

8 0
3 years ago
The Fifth Amendment protects the individual's rights to have a trial by jury
zubka84 [21]
The correct answer is true
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An agent is subject to liability to a third party harmed by the agent’s tortious conduct. Unless an applicable statute provides
    7·1 answer
  • Can my mom just email the school saying that I was sick and I don't have to get a doctor's note? ​
    9·2 answers
  • Antitrust laws allow the U.S. government to do all of the following except _____.
    7·2 answers
  • The number of House of Representatives + Senators = which of the following?
    6·2 answers
  • 3. A representative of the government(a prosecution team) must bring<br> forth charges
    11·1 answer
  • A group of at least 12 citizens that can charge a person with a felony is know as a?
    7·2 answers
  • Whats the part of the brain responsible for hearing?​
    9·2 answers
  • Que acciones ha hecho frente a la violación de derechos<br> el defensor del pueblo
    10·1 answer
  • Mark was a new salesperson in an electronics store. He sold a TV to a customer and accidentally gave a 35% discount. His manager
    15·1 answer
  • Difference Between Anthropology and Pathologists
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!