1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Advocard [28]
3 years ago
8

A feature of decisional law in common law systems which says that, a court, in making a decision, should follow the rulings of p

rior cases that have similar facts is:_______Select one:a. Caveat emptorb. Ex post facto lawsc. Stare decisis d. Contra proferentem
Law
1 answer:
zalisa [80]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Stare decisis

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a Latin terminology meaning standing by that which is has been decided.

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that mandates the courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis makes sure that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. Courts must follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

You might be interested in
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Challenge #9 To decide about heredity You are destined to be a criminal I know You will break the law You are just like your bro
just olya [345]

Answer: this is wrong. Because my brother is a criminal doesn’t mean that I could be a harmful member of society. I could be very different from him.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which places the GREATEST limit on the power of the federal government?
Arlecino [84]
A I think , since they use the bill of rights. Good luck
7 0
2 years ago
A highly powerful foreign government official approaches your company and requests a large sum of money. In return for this brib
olga55 [171]

Answer:

Foreign Corrupt Practices

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will firefighting be a successful job possibility from now to 2022? Why? Describe in one paragraph what the data chart means to
Svetradugi [14.3K]
Maybe because people die from saving and putting out the fire and saving lives
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When you are driving your vehicle, if you see this sign at an intersection you should A: Always come to a complete stop, yield t
    15·1 answer
  • Can state law statue supersede municipality ordinance
    6·2 answers
  • What effect if any does the development of new areas of Science and Technology have on theories ​
    12·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the passage of the 18th amendment to the united states constitution on alcohol consumption?
    7·1 answer
  • How do future consequences influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?​
    5·1 answer
  • Your perception time is always the same.<br> A. TRUE<br> B. FALSE
    7·2 answers
  • Democracy is a ___ sport
    11·2 answers
  • Please help
    9·2 answers
  • Is an amount of money paid to the court to ensure that the defendant
    5·2 answers
  • How is law important to you as a student and a filipino citizen?​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!