The correct answer Is A Justice is Blind
Answer:
true, i think
Explanation:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Answer:
what are you talking about, pal? Are you talking about Brainly? I got banned from brainly yesterday, but now I'm back. So screw all moderators- I only had 12 warnings while others have 30 something.
Answer:
Yes, against Sally only.
Explanation:
With the information given in the question, Ann´s lawsuit will not proceed after Donny´s defendant raise the defenses of limitations.
A statute of limitations looks to set a maximum time after which an event could be legally imported and a lawsuit against it will pass.
A statute of repose limits the time that an action could be brought back because of a particular event.
The bad things that happened to Ann were in 2018 so, for the car accident she had until 2020 to initiate a lawsuit.
On the other hand, the statute of repose began to run once the affected notice the problem that the particular event, in this case, the negligence from Sally, is caused. Ann noticed the pain on her elbow in 2020 so she had until 2030 to initiate a lawsuit.
I hope this answer helps you.
Good morning!
Step 1: Determine whether the statute applies in any way to the legal problem or issue.
Step 2: Carefully read the statute and identify the required elements.
Step 3: Compare or match the required elements to the facts of the problem and determine how the statute applies.
Here's a quizlet which may help:
https://quizlet.com/121955000/legal-analysis-and-writing-ch-3-statutory-analysis-flash-cards/
