1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
boyakko [2]
3 years ago
8

Which of these is an example of separation of powers?

Law
1 answer:
Alchen [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

4

Explanation:

The President is enforcing a law that was passed by Congress. One branch can't have the power to pass a law and enforce it. Therefore the branches are sharing/separating the power.

You might be interested in
Which of the following pieces of evidence BEST supports the idea that face-recognition technology is inaccurate
harina [27]

Answer: you should explain why.

Explanation:

:D

3 0
3 years ago
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
3 years ago
Most teen courts have a/an_______as the decision maker.
natta225 [31]

Answer:

D. Adult Judge

Explanation:

A survey conducted by the American Youth Policy Forum(AYPF) in 2004 revealed that Youth courts used an estimate of;

1. 40% of the adult judge model

2. 26% of the peer jury model

2. 17% of the youth judge model

3. 9% of a combination of models

4. 8% of the youth tribunal

We can thus infer that most teen courts use the adult judge as the decision maker.

When juveniles commit offences their cases can be held in a court presided over by peers who are in the same age bracket with them. A youth judge presides over the case most times. A panel or jury made up of other youth judges sometimes numbering up to six deliberate over the matter and make a decision that would be announced to the court. Restorative justice is applied most of the time.

The sentencing administered by the teen court might include sending the offender to a rehabilitation center so that the main factor that caused his or her misbehavior can be corrected.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Morgan bought a truck with a loan. this means they:
fomenos

Answer:

Financed the truck.

Explanation:

A loan is money given with the understanding that it will be paid back. A finance is giving its requirements for managing wealth and investing money.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Clandestine graves are of interest to forensic taphonomy because _____.
boyakko [2]

Clandestine graves are of interest to forensic taphonomy because criminals try to hide evidence of their acts.                        

<u>Explanation</u>:

  • The work of clandestine graves is to do forensic investigations. There will be many forensic investigation cases. Criminals try to escape from those investigations.
  • So clandestine graves have many interests in investigating the forensic taphonomy. After investigating the event the witness should match the case of the incident. Using particular information the clandestine graves should investigate the incident. They have to make criminals tell the truth of the incident.    

                     

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help writing a 200 word juvenile court essay, pls help :)
    14·1 answer
  • How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened betwee
    14·1 answer
  • The location where a crime took place is called the __________ crime scene, while the ________ crime scene is where evidence of
    14·2 answers
  • Planning to kill someone, and taking the first step toward it is an example of which of the following?
    8·2 answers
  • Medical records are protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Can your medical records be ma
    8·1 answer
  • ¿quien resuelve las controversias en materia civil?
    14·2 answers
  • The Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) is a training program offered in many high schools. Conduct online research an
    11·1 answer
  • Who elects or appoints Representative and Senators?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the most powerful majority leader in the senate ?
    7·1 answer
  • B. If you were to mistakenly make the right turn, what are steps you should take to reduce the risk to yourself and others?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!