All categories

3 years ago

Leadership in small firms is more ____ in comparison to the leadership in large corporations.

Business

1 answer:

enyata [817]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

different

Explanation:

There is a significant difference in small firms leadership compared to large firms depending on legal structures, number of employees in a firm and financial availability.

Large firms have more departments, employees, and operations compared to small ones. For instance, the leadership style and structure required to manage operations and employees in large firms will need to be highly structured to ensure there is effective command and information flow. For small firms, a simple command and communication flow structure will suffice as the number of employees and departments involved are few.

You might be interested in

Nipigon manufacturing has a cost of debt of 9 %, a cost of equity of 11%, and a cost of preferred stock of 10%. nipigon currentl

Vanyuwa [196]

the weighted average cost of capital for Nipigon is 0.049716

Calculate the weighted average cost of capital for Nipigon

cost of Equity share= 120,000 x $25= $30,00,000

cost of Preference share= 49,000 x $38= $18,62,000

cost of debt= $9,50,000

Total cost = $30,00,000 + $18,62,000 + $9,50,000

= $58,12,000

Weightage

Equity= $30,00,000/$58,12,000= 0.516

Preference= $18,62,000/$58,12,000= 0.320

Debt= $9,50,000/$58,12,000= 0.164

Rates

Equity = 0.11

Preference= 0.10

Debt= 0.09 (1-0.4)= 0.54

weighted average cost

Equity= 0.516 x 0.11 = 0.05676

preference= 0.320 x 0.10= 0.0320

Debt= 0.164 x 0.54= 0.00886

Total weighted average cost= 0.05676+0.0320+0.00886

=0.049716

What is the weighted average cost method?

A weighted average computation accounts for the varying levels of significance of the numbers in a data collection. A specified weight is multiplied by each value in the data set before the final computation is completed when calculating a weighted average.

Learn more about weighted average cost method: brainly.com/question/8543883

#SPJ4

3 0

2 years ago

14. in 2018, cities including seattle and san francisco passed laws banning the use of plastic disposable straws because they ar

mr Goodwill [35]

In the above situation, the potential costs that may be derived will be,

Straws made of alternative materials lack the flexibility of plastic straws. This makes it harder for people with disabilities, seniors, and children to use them.
Compostable straws are an alternative to disposable straws. For compostable straws to break down properly they need to be disposed of in a special commercial composter, an infrastructure that needs to be created.
Alternatives to disposable straws do not need fossil fuels to be recycled.

Therefore, the options B, C and D hold true.

<h3>What is the significance of potential costs?</h3>

The potential costs can be referred to or considered as the costs that may have a contingency of being incurred by a producer upon the effects of some external factors.

Therefore, the options B, C and D holds true and states regarding the significance of potential costs.

Learn more about potential costs here:

brainly.com/question/10963256

#SPJ4

The question seems to be incomplete. It has been added below for better reference.

14. In 2018, cities including Seattle and San Francisco passed laws banning the use of plastic disposable straws because they are harmful to the environment (because plastic does not easily biodegrade) and to marine life (which ingest straws that end up in the ocean). Opponents point out that such bans may result in unintended monetary cost as well as external cost.

Which of the following describes potential costs that may arise as a result of these new laws? Select all that apply.

A. Alternatives to plastic straws cost at least 10 times more than the current price of plastic straws.

b. Straws made of alternative materials lack the flexibility of plastic straws. This makes it harder for people with disabilities, seniors, and children to use them.

C. Compostable straws are an alternative to disposable straws. For compostable straws to break down properly they need to be disposed of in a special commercial composter, an infrastructure that needs to be created.

D. Alternatives to disposable straws do not need fossil fuels to be recycled.

4 0

2 years ago

Purposely understaffing customs offices to cause time delays, requiring special licenses that take a long time to obtain, and re

crimeas [40]

Answer: B Administrative delays

Explanation:

Administrative delay means: any Governmental Entity’s failure to act within a reasonable time, in keeping with standard practices for such Governmental Entity, or within the time contemplated in the Interagency Cooperation Agreement, the Planning Cooperation Agreement, any of the Land Acquisition Agreements, the Tax Allocation Agreement, any Acquisition and Reimbursement Agreement.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Round Barn stock has a required return of 11.00% and is expected to pay a dividend of $2.35 next year. Investors expect a growth

34kurt

Answer:

$47

Explanation:

Given that,

Required return = 11.00%

Expect a growth rate = 6.00%

Expected to pay a dividend next year = $2.35

Stock Price:

= Dividends (Div) ÷ (Expected Return (R) - Dividend Growth Rate (G))

= $2.35 ÷ (11% - 6%)

= $2.35 ÷ (5%)

= $47

Therefore, the current fair price for the stock is $47.

7 0

3 years ago

Consider and discuss whether there is a conflict of interest between the executive and an agency in North Carolina.

jekas [21]

RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:

(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or

(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.

(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:

(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;

(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;

(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and

(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.

4 0

3 years ago