<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
Amount realized 22,000 Minus: Basis 89,000 Loss recognized 67000
<u>answer a </u>) Since Karen is single she can guarantee this lose as a common misfortune to a limit of $50,000. Karen won't have the option to guarantee the whole $67,000 that she lost she can just guarantee $50,000.
<u>answer b) </u>Since Karen is recording a joint government form she can guarantee a lose of upto $100,000. Karen will have the option to guarantee the whole loss of $67,000.
<u>answer c )</u> With the stock being bought from another investor as opposed to the sorting out enterprise she can guarantee the whole loss of $67,000 as a captial gain misfortune.
<u>answer d )</u> B. By selling a segment of the stock in one year and the staying stock in one more year Karen could change over the whole misfortune on the deal to a normal misfortune.
I believe the answer is: A) You own a home.
The 1040EZ is created to favour a more bare-bones return (for people who had no dependants i.e wife&kids and generally make under $ 100,000 a year). 1040 on the other hand, is a form that created to favour someone who typicall make more than $ 100,000 and own properties
Answer:
Conversion of Estimates of Useful Life to Straight-line Depreciation Rate:
Useful Life Straight-line
Depreciation Rate
(a) 10 years 10%
(b) 8 years 12.5%
(c) 25 years 4%
(d) 40 years 2.5%
(e) 5 years 20%
(f) 4 years 25%
(g) 20 years 5%
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Straight-line
Useful Life Depreciation Rate Conversion
(a) 10 years 10% 100/10
(b) 8 years 12.5% 100/8
(c) 25 years 4% 100/25
(d) 40 years 2.5% 100/40
(e) 5 years 20% 100/5
(f) 4 years 25% 100/4
(g) 20 years 5% 100/20
Individuals in the group judged to be high in warmth and competence viewed by participants in relation to themselves as an in-group.
An in-group is a group of things, people, or other entities that are similar in some way. In-groups, particularly in humans, are defined by beliefs, values, and identities. Within in-groups, there is a shared understanding that group members share some characteristics. Humans, on the other hand, frequently organize items and their lives into in-groups and out-groups without consciously realizing it. This is a neurological shortcut that brains develop over time to assist humans in sorting and categorizing large amounts of information. Depending on the power dynamics and privilege that result from grouping, the outcomes can be negative, positive, or neutral.
An out-group is a group that is distinguished from an in-group by its dissimilarity. Where an in-group is defined by the presence of a shared element of identity, such as a belief or a trait, and an out-group is defined by the absence of that shared element.
Learn more about in-groups and out-groups here:
brainly.com/question/14429597
#SPJ4
Answer:
Cost of equity = 13.6%
Explanation:
<em>We will work out the cost of equity, using the the dividend valuation model. The model states that the value of a stock is the present value of the future divided discounted at the cost of equity.</em>
The model is given below:
P = D× (1+g)/(r-g)
P- price of stock, D- dividend payable now, g- growth rate in dividend, r- cost of equity
<em>So we substitute </em>
14.65 = 1.48× (1+r)/(r-0.021)
<em>cross multiplying</em>
(r-0.021)× 14.65 = 1.48 × (1+r)
14.65r - 0.30765
= 1.48 + 1.48r
<em>collecting like terms</em>
14.65r - 1.48r = 1.48 + 0.30765
13.17
r = 1.78765
<em>Divide both sides by 13.17
</em>
r =1.78
/13.17= 0.135
r=0.135× 100= 13.6
Cost of equity = 13.6%
=0.135736522
