Will give brainiest
2 answers:
You might be interested in
1. Rational numbers can be written as a ratio (fraction)
Whole numbers are rational. 5 = 5/1, for example.
Square roots are NOT rational. Example: √3
However, square roots of square numbers can be simplified, and are therefore rational. <span>√4 = 2, rational.</span>
√4 + <span>√16 = 2 + 4 = 6. rational
</span>√5 + √36...<span> irrational
</span>√9 + <span>√24... irrational
</span>2 × <span>√4 = 2 × 2 = 4. rational
</span>√49 × <span>√81 = 7 × 9 = 63. rational
</span>3√12... irrational
2.
3.
4.![n^\frac1x=\sqrt[x]n](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%5E%5Cfrac1x%3D%5Csqrt%5Bx%5Dn)
![\sqrt[3]{m^2n^5}=m^{\frac23}n^{\frac53}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bm%5E2n%5E5%7D%3Dm%5E%7B%5Cfrac23%7Dn%5E%7B%5Cfrac53%7D)
5.
A, since neither 3 nor 12 is a square but we end up with 6.
Whole numbers are rational. 5 = 5/1, for example.
Square roots are NOT rational. Example: √3
However, square roots of square numbers can be simplified, and are therefore rational. <span>√4 = 2, rational.</span>
√4 + <span>√16 = 2 + 4 = 6. rational
</span>√5 + √36...<span> irrational
</span>√9 + <span>√24... irrational
</span>2 × <span>√4 = 2 × 2 = 4. rational
</span>√49 × <span>√81 = 7 × 9 = 63. rational
</span>3√12... irrational
2.
3.
4.
5.
A, since neither 3 nor 12 is a square but we end up with 6.
Answer:
50 legs
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that a dog has 4 legs, a cat has 4 legs, a giraffe has 4 legs, a duck has 2 legs, and a chicken has 2 legs. So, we want to calculate , right?
Wrong! It's a trick question! The chickens aren't on the floor, so they don't count. So, we really want .
We multiply it out to get .
We add these up to get .
So, our answer is legs.