1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
romanna [79]
3 years ago
5

The industrial revolution was a time of great change for great Britain, and women benefited the most from these changes. Childre

n were also able to find work in the new factories that spring up and cities. In the children were often not paid well and forced to work long hours and dangerous conditions, the benefits far outweigh the problems. Poor man also had more opportunities and were able to make more money than before the industrial revolution. This new earning power allow them to better contribute and helped grow the nations economy.
which sentence best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument?

A. The historical argument is not credible because it does not make a claim about women during the industrial revolution.

B. The historical argument is not credible because it does not support the claim with evidence from a credible source.

C. The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong claim and evidence from a credible source.

D. The historical argument is credible because it makes the correct claim that woman benefited from the industrial revolution.

please answer fast I need the answer for Apex

History
1 answer:
Annette [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Is not credible because it does not support the claim with evidence f4

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The first political parties in the United States were established in the 1790s largely because of political differences between
-BARSIC- [3]
D. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton
7 0
3 years ago
The relationship between american indians and the french described in the excerpt was most similar to the relationship between a
Maslowich

The relationship between the Native Americans and the French is very similar to the relationship between the Dutch and the Natives.

<h3>How was the relationship between the French and the Native Americans?</h3>

The relationship between the French and the Native Americans can be labeled as a relationship of respect in which the French recognized the natives as individuals equal to them who had rights and duties unlike other Europeans who saw the natives as slaves and human beings. lower.

<h3>How did the natives relate to the Dutch?</h3>

In general, the relationship between the Dutch and the Native Americans was good because there were no attacks or confrontations. On the contrary, there was collaboration to establish a Dutch commercial point in North America. Later, they had to give in to British pressure and leave the place.

Learn more about native americans in: brainly.com/question/8678061

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Describe two events trends and or developments that occurred between 1914 and 1929
Scorpion4ik [409]
Two event trends were the aesthetic and rational dress reform movements
8 0
4 years ago
Which of the following were weaknesses apparent in American society in the late 1800s?
soldi70 [24.7K]
<span>These are all correct: 
A. People became too materialistic.

C. The economic system didn't work well.

D. The governmental system adjusted to change too slowly.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Explain ONE way in which the legacy of imperialism affected the economic development of new states in the second half of the twe
Natali5045456 [20]

´The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

One way in which the legacy of imperialism affected the economic development of new states in the second half of the twentieth century in the countries of Africa.

After European nations allow independence to most of the African nations, these African countries have been immersed in poverty, hunger, social problems, and diseases. This can be an example of the legacy they left after years of imperialism in Africa.

Let's remember that at the end of the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, European superpowers agreed to split the African territory in what was known as the "Scramble for Africa." European nations such as France, Portugal, Great Britain. Germany or Belgium, split the African territories to colonize them and exploit the many raw materials and natural resources.

When the Europeans left those territories, the African people did not what to do after so many years of dependence.

Right now, all their struggles are consequences of that European imperialism.  

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What job did bank robber jesse james do in the civil war?
    9·1 answer
  • Why would Japan want to emphasize teamwork in their society<br>​
    10·2 answers
  • What is one key purpose of myth in prehistoric culture? to commemorate historical events to entertain audiences to explain natur
    11·1 answer
  • Which is an example of an environmental influence that would most likely result in natural selection?
    9·1 answer
  • During the 1840s Americans use the idea of manifest destiny for ?
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!! Giving extra points to the best answers!!
    6·2 answers
  • Who successfully led the British Parliament during the French and Indian War?
    14·1 answer
  • Who formed the first united kingdom of Isreal?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the fugitive slave act benefit northerners
    12·1 answer
  • What important documents came out of each revolution?<br> American Revolution<br> French Revolution
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!