Answer:
#4 would be the correct answer here
Answer:
Blitzkrieg is a term used to describe a method of offensive warfare designed to strike a swift, focused blow at an enemy using mobile, maneuverable forces, including armored tanks and air support. Such an attack ideally leads to a quick victory, limiting the loss of soldiers and artillery.
Explanation:
Many Europeans had experienced the tyranny of monarchies in their own countries. The Patriots' war against George III inspired them. Lafayette and Pulaski may have also been moved by the ideas in the declaration of Independence. I hope this helps you
Answer:
The term standard of living refers to the conditions in which people live especially in terms of comfort, goods, and basic needs being completely fulfilled. Because of this, the standard of living varies according to the geographical zone, country, and even continent and it is measured through the existence of poverty, employment conditions, incomes in each family or individual, education, amount of time for leisure, health services, and others.
In the case of Western Europe that includes countries such as Austria, France, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and other the living standards are mainly high this means people who live there have good conditions in terms of comfort, goods and basic needs being fulfilled, one of the factors that prove this is that level of education is higher than in other areas of the world and the level of literacy or basic education for reading and writing 100% or close to it, which means all the population of these countries is able to write and read. Thus, the statement that is true about the standard of living in Western Europe is that most people can read and write as Western Europe has a high standard of living that is reflected on the education people has there.
Explanation:
help from someone
The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
