Answer:
Punitive damages are those harms that surpass basic pay and are granted with an expectation to rebuff the respondent. The essential target of reformatory harm isn't to remunerate the oppressed party however to rebuff the gathering that hosts irritated or wronged the bothered get-together.
Granting punitive damages for penetrate of agreement can conceivably hurt the general public. This is on the grounds that numerous penetrates of agreement can be because of conduct of the culpable party which is neither intentional nor careless. Reformatory harms should just be restricted and material to tort cases and should just be utilized to rebuff those bad behaviors that are conscious and foolish. Anyway utilizing correctional activities to rebuff somebody who has penetrated an agreement because of specific occasions or circumstances that were not in his control will be crooked and uncalled for.
Punitive damages are semi criminal in nature and ordering and clubbing all break of agreement (despite the fact that not purposeful or not having components of dishonesty, malevolence or wanton) as semi criminal in nature will be in opposition to open arrangement and will hurt the general public.
Answer:
$33,410
Explanation:
The computation of Ending finished goods inventory after allocation of underapplied or overapplied manufacturing overhead is shown below:-
Ending finished goods inventory after allocation of overapplied manufacturing overhead
= (Total of finished goods - (Manufacturing overhead applied of finished goods ÷ Total of Manufacturing overhead applied) × Overapplied amount
= ($34,530 - ($6,240 ÷ $39,000) × $7,000)
= $34,530 - $1,120
= $33,410
Reducing interest rates means that interest is less, which in turn means more money for people to spend so yes I would say it increases the money supply.
I would think it might be, "absorption costing."
