Answer:
Legal and Illegal Interview Questions:
Legal:
How many times a month were you late for work at your last job?
Did you graduate from high school?
Illegal:
Do you have any mental illnesses?
What year did you graduate from high school?
Explanation:
Employers of labor should be aware of some interview questions, which are deemed legal, and some others that may be deemed illegal to ask job candidates. For this reason, employers should be careful to ensure they play by the rules. The illegal questions are considered so because they tend to exacerbate discrimination. Examples of interview questions that are deemed illegal are questions relating to age. Others include questions about marital status and parental status. Some other illegal questions relate to citizenship status, mental illness status, religious affiliations, and race or skin color.
Answer:
Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney
Explanation:
Dues and subscriptions are professional expenses. They are tax-deductible subject to the 2% Adjusted Gross Income.
Professional subscriptions refer to any fees that the person may have to pay to get his business or profession registered with a "governing body" for which a license is required.
One cannot claim tax back on professional fees and subscriptions.
Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications.
Answer:
Each state had no intention of giving up its soveriegnty to a central government.
Explanation:
Answer:
YESS
Explanation:
The Constitution addresses the main problems facing the Articles of Confederation. (weak national gov.)
For example, the government had no power to tax, this meant they could only raise funds if the states willingly donated money. The national government could not fund military forces which lead to the inability to suppress Shay's rebellion.
Shay's rebellion was a protest attack held by a group of poor farmers.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
the Articles of Confederation were not supposed to be temporary but it very quickly showed to be unuseful with many problems and holes in the articles. the constitution was made to be a better and more complex version of the articles
