Should a prosecutor have the authority to refuse to charge an indictment made by a grand jury?

Law

1 answer:

vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A grand jury might not indict, but the prosecutor may still bring the defendant to trial if she has a strong enough case. Without a grand jury indictment, the prosecutor has to demonstrate to the trial that she has enough evidence t continue the case.

You might be interested in

HURRRYYY PLEASE

GenaCL600 [577]

Answer:

During The Constitutional Convention, James Madison suggested to have three branches. The legislative branch, the Congress, would make laws. The executive branch would carry out the laws. A judicial branch would settle legal arguments. This set up a system of checks and balances where all three branches had a distribution of power so that nothing could become more powerful than them. They were under the Virginia Plan, which provided for a national government for them.

(75 words)

Hope this helped! :)

(NOTE: Do you mind marking me as Brainliest?)

7 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between a Bursary and a Student loan

spin [16.1K]

Answer: The difference between a loan and a bursary is that a loan has to be paid back whilst a bursary is non-repayable.

6 0

2 years ago

Rite

Anastasy [175]

Answer:

More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs.

Explanation:

More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs are the changes have been observing in the society as comparison to the last three years. Technology such as transportation, devices, medical and other industrial instruments and media devices are more advanced as compared to previous years. Due to these devices, people depend more on technology which is a source of easiness as well as causes adverse effect on health of people.

6 0

3 years ago

The elements of child abduction (PC 207e) are: (1) taking a child (2) intent to detain the child and (3) ______ from its parents

Ainat [17]

Answer:

1. ³/⁵-¹⁹⅘fright 5&23⁹/⁶

4 0

2 years ago

for states to pass a law that also happens to restrict religious practices, the law must have what type of aim or purpose?

Elza [17]

For states to pass a law that also happens to restrict religious practices, the law must have Nonpartisan.

Religion is commonly described as a social-cultural device of unique behaviors and practices, morals, ideals, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or agencies, that typically relate humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and religious factors;[1] but, there may be no scholarly consensus over what exactly constitutes a faith. One-of-a-kind religions can also or might not contain numerous elements ranging from the divine,[4] sacred things,[5] religion,[6] a supernatural being or supernatural beings[7] or "a few kind of ultimacy and transcendence to be able to provide norms and power for the rest of life".[8] religious practices might also consist of rituals, sermons, commemoration or veneration (of deities and/or saints), sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trances, initiations, funerary offerings, matrimonial services, meditation, prayer, music, artwork, dance, public carrier, or other components of human culture.

Learn more about religious here

brainly.com/question/681337

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago