Answer:
Total cash= $193,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimated sales ($):
January= $150,000
February= $180,000
March= $220,000
40% in cash from that same month of sales
50% in cash from the previous month's sales
10% in cash from the sales from two months ago
C<u>ash collection March:</u>
From March= 220,000*0.4= 88,000
From February= 180,000*0.5= 90,000
From January= 150,000*0.1= 15,000
Total cash= $193,000
Answer:
Explanation:
The constraints we have are two in number.
1. Sam and Kori cannot sit next to each other
2. Lynn and Kori need to sit next to each other.
Both options A and B satisfy both these constraints because Sam and Kori are seated apart and Lynn and Kori are seated together.
Option C satisfies only one constraint which is that Kori is sitting next to Lynn. She is sitting next to Sam however so this option is wrong and by extension, so is option D as well.
A.) personal income
with you using your own money nothing deducts or raises money for rent or wage.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation: Drill-down capability refers to the capability necessary to achieve a goal such as a desired level of output. It enables users to get details, and details of details, of information, and it also involves the aggregation of information and features simple roll-ups to information that are complex and interrelated.
What this means is that, Drill down is a capability that takes the person who needs information from a more general view of the data to a view that is more specific and precise. For example, when there is a report that shows sales revenue by state can allow the user to select a specific state, click on it and see sales revenue by county or city within that particular selected state.
The vice-president of HR for Health Wizard, Inc. is designing a performance appraisal system that includes subordinate ratings of their supervisors.The supervisors are concerned about this and have raised all of the following objections EXCEPT (d) the concern that they will be rated on how nice they are to subordinates rather than their true supervisory performance
Explanation:
The rating of the sub-ordinates by their supervisors can not be considered as a perfect way for performance appraisal because it will be over-focused on the behavior of the sub-ordinate with their supervisors rather than the on the job performance.
The sub-ordinates who follow all the commands of their supervisors will be rated high rather than those who perform well on the task given to them
So the answer to the above question is (d) the concern that they will be rated on how nice they are to subordinates rather than their true supervisory performance
