What did the Five Civilized Tribes have in common?

Match each of the sentences from the Declaration of Independence to its purpose. Type the letter of your answer in the space pro

yarga [219]

.To appeal to the audience's logical sense, mentioning that the attitude of the king can no longer continue, and the Declaration will ensure he won't.. B.To gain the audience's sympathy, by bringing out these ideals that every person desires, which were intended by the Creator.. C.To refute any argument for reconciliation, because, as is mentioned

4 0

3 years ago

How was Galileo treated when he published his scientific findings about the heliocentric nature of the universe?

const2013 [10]

It’s B

He was arrested, charged with heresy, and forced to deny that his findings were true.

Hope this helped

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What occurred during the Holocaust, and how did this affect post-World War Il politics?

scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

How do the achievements of Mohandas Gandhi compare with those of Nelson Mandela?

True [87]

Answer:

well here are nelson Mandela's accomplishments

#1 HE BECAME THE NATIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE ANC YOUTH LEAGUE IN 1950

#2 MANDELA WAS A LEADING OPPONENT OF THE 1948 APARTHEID LEGISLATION

#3 HE CO-FOUNDED THE FIRST BLACK LEGAL PARTNERSHIP IN SOUTH AFRICA

#4 HIS SPEECH DURING RIVONIA TRIAL IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE GREAT SPEECHES OF THE 20TH CENTURY

#5 NELSON MANDELA PLAYED THE LEADING ROLE IN ENDING APARTHEID

#6 NELSON MANDELA WAS THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT OF SOUTH AFRICA

#7 HE FOCUSED ON NATIONAL RECONCILIATION DURING HIS PRESIDENCY

#8 HE SERVED AS THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE NON-ALIGNED MOVEMENT FROM 1998 TO 1999

#9 HE FOUNDED A NUMBER OF ORGANISATIONS TO PROMOTE EQUALITY AND FIGHT PROBLEMS LIKE AIDS

#10 NELSON MANDELA WAS AWARDED THE 1993 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

whereas here are Gandhi's accomplishments:

#1 HE FOUGHT AGAINST RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

#2 HIS SATYAGRAHA CAMPAIGN IN SA LED TO THE 1914 INDIAN RELIEF ACT

#3 MAHATMA GANDHI WON HIS FIRST BATTLE OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN INDIA AT CHAMPARAN

#4 HE SUCCESSFULLY LED A NON-VIOLENT TAX REVOLT IN KHEDA

#5 HE LED THE POPULAR NON-COOPERATION MOVEMENT IN EARLY 1920S

#6 MAHATMA GANDHI LED THE FAMOUS SALT MARCH TO DANDI

#7 HE LAUNCHED THE QUIT INDIA MOVEMENT IN 1942 DEMANDING END OF BRITISH RULE

#8 MAHATMA GANDHI WAS THE LEADING FIGURE RESPONSIBLE FOR INDIA ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE

#9 HE FOUGHT AGAINST SOCIAL EVILS IN SOCIETY LIKE UNTOUCHABILITY

#10 GANDHI WAS RUNNER UP TO EINSTEIN IN TIME’S PERSON OF THE CENTURY

so i think that they both achieve loads of great achievements because they made a change in the world well that's my opinion

Explanation:

While both protested oppression through peaceful resistance, Mandela eventually accepted armed resistance.

Both wanted political freedom for their respective countries. Gandhi used peaceful non-cooperation. Mandela murdered people.

so i think that

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Explain the principle of checks and balances as it relates to the power of the president. Provide one example to support your ex

Scrat [10]

Checks and Balances was designed to keep each branch from assuming too much power. Presidential power is checked and balanced in many ways. While he can veto various bills and keep them from becoming laws, he can be overridden by a 2/3 vote in both houses. SO if the Congress feels like the President is over stepping his bounds then they can in turn overrule him. The Supreme Court is also in the mix in that if they deem a law to be unconstitutional then they can rule it so and the law is no more. Presidents can influence Supreme Courts by whom they nominate for open positions (or in the case of one President, attempt to add more judges to the Court). However, after the nomination is made and the Senate approves and confirms them then they are free. The only way a Judge can be removed is they are found to be doing something illegal, deemed incompetent and unable to continue doing their job, resign, or die. This allows judges to "operate outside the realm of politics." The idea is that they can focus and not worry about politics and we can assume that decisions will be made free from political influences and bribery.

6 0

3 years ago