The greatest risk of a low-cost provider strategy is getting lost with overly high price reduction and ending up with lower profit.
<h3>Low-cost / low-price advantage </h3>
It results in high profit only if;
- (1) prices are reduced by less than the size of the cost advantage or
- (2) the added volume is large enough to bring in a bigger total profit despite lower margins per unit sold.
Therefore, the greatest risk is a low profit.
learn more on low cost strategy from here: brainly.com/question/5516605
Answer:
Life insurance.
Explanation:
A life insurance policy can be defined as a contract between a policyholder and an insurer, in which the insurer agrees to pay an amount of money to a specific beneficiary either upon the death of the insured person (decedent) or after a set period of time.
All of the following assets such as home, boat, vehicle require a title as proof of ownership, except a life insurance because no one person can present a proof to attest to the ownership of their life.
Simply stated, a life of an individual is abstract and as such can not be quantified or qualified by any document as a proof to be presented to another person or business entity. Thus, a life insurance cannot be used as a collateral to obtain credits or loans from a financial institution or investors.
Answer:
$30,000 increase
Explanation:
Piper Corp is operating at 70% capacity, and so we can produce the unit in-house at no increase to fixed cost we are already incurring. So we assume fixed cost for the extra production is zero
Without fixed cost the unit can be produced at $26, so cost of producing the units needed= 26*15,000= $390,000
To buy the product we need $24 per unit, so the cost of buying the needed units is= 24* 15,000= $360,000
The differential cost of making the part rather than purchasing it = Cost of inhouse production- Cost of Buying= 390,000- 360,000= $30,000
