Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The null hypothesis is the problem statement and alternative hypothesis is counter of the null hypothesis.
Hence, the null hypothesis here is the rate of extinction was neither higher nor lower when there were sudden climatic changes (asteroid strike)
And alternate hypothesis is "the rate of extinction was either higher or lower when there were sudden climatic changes (asteroid strike)"
Hence, option C is correct
Given what we know, we can say that biology and neo-Darwinism both support the idea that natural selection explains how the environment selects organizations for survival or extinction.
<h3>Natural Selection. </h3>
- This concept is often summarized by the phrase "survival of the fittest".
- This refers to the ability of an organism to adapt to its environment.
- The better-adapted organisms will live to pass on their genetic information, thus changing the organization of the species.
- Those not able to do so will face extinction.
Therefore, since natural selection involves the survival or extinction of a species based solely upon their ability to adapt and change their genetic organization in response to their environment, we can say that this concept helps to explain how the environment selects organizations for survival or extinction.
To learn more about natural selection visit:
brainly.com/question/2725702?referrer=searchResults
The image of a point is B'(-4, 11). A 180° clockwise rotation was performed to get this image. What were the coordinates of the pre-image?
(4, -11)(11, 4)(-11, -4)<span>(4, 11)</span>
Answer:
In 1928, Sir Alexander Fleming was studying Staphylococcus bacteria growing in culture dishes. He noticed that a mold called Penicillium was also growing in some of the dishes. A clear area existed around the mold because all the bacteria that had grown in this area had died. In the culture dishes without the mold, no clear areas were present.
Fleming thought that the mold must be producing a chemical that killed the bacteria. He decided to isolate this substance and test it to see if it would kill bacteria. Fleming transferred the mold to a nutrient broth solution. This solution contained all the materials the mold needed to grow. After the mold grew, he removed it from the nutrient broth. Fleming then added the nutrient broth in which the mold had grown to a culture of bacteria. He observed that the bacteria died. He also added the same type of broth that had not been exposed to the mold, to a culture of the same type of bacteria. Nothing happened to the bacteria.
Explanation:
n 1928, Sir Alexander Fleming was studying Staphylococcus bacteria growing in culture dishes. He noticed that a mold called Penicillium was also growing in some of the dishes. A clear area existed around the mold because all the bacteria that had grown in this area had died. In the culture dishes without the mold, no clear areas were present.
Fleming thought that the mold must be producing a chemical that killed the bacteria. He decided to isolate this substance and test it to see if it would kill bacteria. Fleming transferred the mold to a nutrient broth solution. This solution contained all the materials the mold needed to grow. After the mold grew, he removed it from the nutrient broth. Fleming then added the nutrient broth in which the mold had grown to a culture of bacteria. He observed that the bacteria died. He also added the same type of broth that had not been exposed to the mold, to a culture of the same type of bacteria. Nothing happened to the bacteria.
