Answer:
<h3>-16</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
PEMDAS- (Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiply, Divide, Add, and Subtract) from left to right.
BOMDAS- (Brackets, Of, Multiply, Divide, Add, and Subtract) from left to right.
(-8)2
-8*2 (First, remove parenthesis.)
-8*2=-16
-16
Therefore, the final answer is -16.
It's difficult to make out what the force and displacement vectors are supposed to be, so I'll generalize.
Let <em>θ</em> be the angle between the force vector <em>F</em> and the displacement vector <em>r</em>. The work <em>W</em> done by <em>F</em> in the direction of <em>r</em> is
<em>W</em> = <em>F</em> • <em>r</em> cos(<em>θ</em>)
The cosine of the angle between the vectors can be obtained from the dot product identity,
<em>a</em> • <em>b</em> = ||<em>a</em>|| ||<em>b</em>|| cos(<em>θ</em>) ==> cos(<em>θ</em>) = (<em>a</em> • <em>b</em>) / (||<em>a</em>|| ||<em>b</em>||)
so that
<em>W</em> = (<em>F</em> • <em>r</em>)² / (||<em>F</em>|| ||<em>r</em>||)
For instance, if <em>F</em> = 3<em>i</em> + <em>j</em> + <em>k</em> and <em>r</em> = 7<em>i</em> - 7<em>j</em> - <em>k</em> (which is my closest guess to the given vectors' components), then the work done by <em>F</em> along <em>r</em> is
<em>W</em> = ((3<em>i</em> + <em>j</em> + <em>k</em>) • (7<em>i</em> - 7<em>j</em> - <em>k</em>))² / (√(3² + 1² + 1²) √(7² + (-7)² + (-1)²))
==> <em>W</em> ≈ 5.12 J
(assuming <em>F</em> and <em>r</em> are measured in Newtons (N) and meters (m), respectively).
The speed of the airplane = 2951 / 6.5 = 454 mph
Answer: 1. HA cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have an acute angle common in both the triangles.
2. HL can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as the triangles are right triangle with equal legs and hypotenuse.
3. SAS can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as there are two congruent sides in both triangles and included angles ∠A=∠D=90° [right angle].
4. LA cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have an acute angle common in both the triangles.
5. AAS cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have two angles common in both the triangles.
6.SSS can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is shown that all the sides of one triangle is congruent to the other.
HOPE THIS HELPS
