Answer:
the remaining budget for other expenses = 1/8 of the total budget
Explanation:
Since the city's administrative personnel expenses are 1/8 larger than both maintenance expenses and safety expenses, it means that safety expenses are equal to maintenance expenses.
Since maintenance expenses are 1/4 of the total budget, safety expenses are also 1/4 of the total budget.
Administrative personnel expenses are 1/8 higher, so that means that they equal 1/4 + 1/8 of the total expenses.
If we add the three categories = 1/4 + 1/4 + (1/4 + 1/8) = 7/8
So the remaining budget for other expenses = 1 - 7/8 = 1/8 of the total budget
Answer:
A. used by businesses to price unique products for different jobs
As the product are different to each other in properties and materials or are required to be performed in different location (IE: real-state maintenance or construction) We need to follow the cost on a per-job basis
Explanation:
B. used by businesses to price identical products
No when the product are identical we don't need to discriminate over which customer ask the job nor the type of product it was requested.
C. used to calculate equivalent units
NO. That is processing cost
D. used to calculate the percentage of work completed
NO that is a given, we measure the amount of work completed under pretty much any cost method.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
A price taking firm is a firm that must sell at the price determined by the forces of demand and supply. This is typical of firms that in industries that sell identical products.
If the firm charges a price higher than equilibrium price, customers would go to other suppliers and the firm would sell known of its product.
There would be no incentive for a firm to sell below equilibrium price because it would be earning losses.
An example of an industry characterised by price taking firms are perfectly competitive industries.
For example, a farmer selling oranges is an example of a price taking firm
Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
Answer:
Present value (PV) = $3,000
Interest rate (r) = 6% = 0.06
Number of years (n) = 2 years
Future value (FV) = ?
FV = PV(1 + r)n
FV = $3,000(1 + 0.06)2
FV = $3,000(1.06)2
FV= $3,000 x 1.1236
FV = $3.370.80
Explanation:
In this case, there is need to compound the present value for 2 years at 6% interest per annum. The formula to be applied is the formula for future value of a lump sum (single investment).
