I think the answer is Web banners
Answer:
midpoint method for income elasticity of demand = {ΔQD / [(QD₀ + QD₁)/2]} / {ΔI / [(I₀ + I₁)/2]}
midpoint method for price elasticity of demand = {ΔQD / [(QD₀ + QD₁)/2]} / {ΔP / [(P₀ + P₁)/2]}
a) I will use the information from January and February to calculate the price elasticity of demand of Coke. I cannot use March instead of January because income increased during that month.
QD₀ = 14
QD₁ = 10
P₀ = 2.40
P₁ = 3
PED = {(10 - 14) / [(14 + 10)/2]} / {(3 - 2.4) / [(3 + 2.4)/2]}
PED = {-4 / 12} / {0.6 / 2.7} = -0.3333 / 0.2222 = -1.5 or |1.5| in absolute terms
Coke's PED is elastic since a 1% change in price will result in a larger proportional change in the quantity demanded.
b) I will use the information from January and March to calculate the income elasticity of demand of Coke. These are the two months where income changes but price of Coke remains the same.
QD₀ = 14
QD₁ = 20
I₀ = 300
I₁ = 500
PED = {(20 - 14) / [(14 + 20)/2]} / {(500 - 300) / [(300 + 500)/2]}
PED = {6 / 17} / {200 / 400} = 0.3529 / 0.5 = 0.71
Coke's IED is positive, therefore, Coke is a normal good.
The rule of 72 says that to find the number of years required to double your money at a given interest rate, you just divide the interest rate into 72.
so in this equation we would use: 72/x=12 then you solve for X
X = 6%
So it would take approximately 6% ROI
Answer: D. There is no impact on non controlling interests of a subsidiary
Explanation: Non controlling interest is a owner's position on outstanding shares which is less than 50%, it is also known as minority shares. Non controlling interests lack voting right to take decisions.
Non controlling interests of a subsidiary does not have any impact on the patent company. Like in this case the non controlling interests of the subsidiary, when there are downstream transfers of inventory between the parent company there will be no impact on the non controlling interests.
Answer:
8392848283738281818837372829391000°288223627281
Explanation:
28383838291837456