Answer: $54,000 per production run
Explanation:
As we are dealing with the decision of whether or not to process the good further, the irrelevant cost would be the cost of producing product B from input R.
This is because this cost has already been incurred to produce product B and so is a sunk cost. Sunk costs are irrelevant to the decision to process further.
30,000 units of B were made from 90,000 units R so the cost of B is:
= 30,000 / 50,000 * 90,000
= $54,000
<em />
<em>The options here are probably for a variant of this question.</em>
I think people would have more knowledge in who actually does what. This means people have more credibility and accountability. This would greatly reduce the amount of real reactions from anonymous companies. People need to be held at the actions they have done, and they certainly would be after this openness. The world and business market would be much <span>safer places for all people involved. </span>
I believe the answer is: <span>their connections to the journal
For example,let's say I invested some of my money to companies that develop Drug A.
If i'm required to conduct a peer review for a journal that wrote bad side effects to Drug A, i definitely had a conflict of interest and develop a tendency to give a bad review for that journal.</span>
Answer:
b.work-in-process account.
Explanation:
When materials are requisitioned for use in production in a job-order costing firm, the cost of materials is added to the work-in-process account.
Following journal Entry is passed.
DR. Work in process xxx
CR. raw Material Inventory xxx
As work in process is debited in the above transaction, the cost of material is being added to it.
