Answer:
equitable relief
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
A lawyer refers to an individual who has obtained a law degree and is saddled with the responsibility of giving legal advice, initiate and execute lawsuits for his or her clients. These legal practitioners are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidence and give a verdict about legal cases.
An equitable relief also referred to as equitable remedy can be defined as judicial remedies granted to an aggrieved person by a court of equity, requiring that the other party act or refrain from indulging in a specific act because ordinary legal remedies couldn't provide the aggrieved party sufficient (adequate) restitution for an offense commited against him or her. Thus, an equitable relief (remedy) is an injunction granted by a court of equity requiring a party to a contract to either act (mandamus or specific performance) or refrain from indulging in a particular act.
In this context, when a court of competent jurisdiction awards or grants custody of a child to one parent rather than awarding it to the other, this is an example of equitable relief.
In conclusion, an equitable relief or remedy is typically a nonmonetary judgement granted by a court of equity when ordinary legal remedies fail to provide sufficient (adequate) restitution to an aggrieved party.
Answer:
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation:
Consider this explanation too
The IRR is the project’s expected rate of return, assuming that intermediate cash flows also earn the IRR. If this return exceeds the cost of the capital invested in the project, the excess value goes to the firm’s shareholders. Therefore, independent projects whose IRR is greater than the WACC should be accepted.
Therefore in this case WACC of the project is 7% and IRR of the project is 1.86% which is less than WACC of the project. Hence the firm reject the project delta.
Calculation of IRR is based on Cash inflows and outflows for the number of years so that increase in cost of capital will not affect IRR.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Desses would have had a stronger argument if the contract was silent in this way because it would have been less likely that there was a designated class of third-party beneficiaries under the contract.
Cheers
Answer:
$41.39
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Annul Dividend paid, D0 = $2.84 per share
Growth rate, g = 1.85% = 0.0185
Rate of return required, r = 10.4% = 0.104
Now,
Current price of the stock at year 11 = D12 ÷ [ r - g]
= [ $2.84 × (1 + g)¹²] ÷ [ r - g]
= [ $2.84 × (1 + 0.0185)¹²] ÷ [ 0.104 - 0.0185]
= 3.539 ÷ 0.0855
= $41.39
Answer:
D. The cost of living in the country is lower than that of France
Explanation:
PPP or Purchasing Power Parity is a measure of the cost of living in different countries. When GDP Per Capita is computed accounting for PPP, significant differences can show up between this measure and Nominal GDP Per Capita, this is because of differences in the cost of living among countries.
If the GDP Per Capita Nominal of a country is lower than that of France, it means that measured by US Dollars, the other country produces less output per person than France. However, if the GDP Per Capita PPP of the same country is higher than that of France, it means that even if output is less, people in the other country can buy more things with less income than people in France. (Remember than when calculating GDP, output is the same as income).
