1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
myrzilka [38]
3 years ago
14

Select the correct answer.

English
2 answers:
UkoKoshka [18]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. key points

Explanation:

a summary is for the audience to quickly grasp the entire article/story/passage(etc.), it should be short and sweet, consisting only of the key points. your personal opinions are not required. background information is unessential, because it would cause your summary to be too long, and summaries are meant to be short so as to bring out the main topics only, not cover the entire passage. minor examples are optional to include, but not needed as well.

egoroff_w [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A. Key Points

Explanation: I just had this one a test and answered correctly.

You might be interested in
Which fact is most important in determining constitutionality in this case
goldenfox [79]

The students were punished for a nonviolent expression of their views.

6 0
3 years ago
Character analysis for the outsiders<br> please help
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

Explanation:   anwser is b

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of sentences is this? Before Alan could graduate, he had to pass his final exams, so his brother helped him study. (4
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

It was not D: complex. I just took it and got it wrong

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
100 POINTS! PLZ HELP QUICK!
exis [7]

Answer:

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature; a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us;

For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states;

4 0
3 years ago
The sentence is an example of personification because it is giving ________ qualities to an inanimate noun.
tatuchka [14]
I would say human. Hope this helps!
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following shows a correctly formatted in-text citation for paraphrased information? Group of answer choices All peo
    5·1 answer
  • English must be attered to suit different purposes and different audiences
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following questions should you ask yourself when analyzing details? A. How are the sentences written—are the senten
    10·2 answers
  • What did dogs do during the Klondike Gold Rush
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an advantage of a centrally planned economy?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the main idea of this sentence? Dogs do many things that are very cute. Dogs enjoy rolling on their backs. Dogs cause pr
    11·1 answer
  • Will give brainlyest
    13·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry.
    8·2 answers
  • What is a good name for a gold supervillain his powers include turning people into gold and controlling anything into gold
    12·1 answer
  • A paradox exists when a seemingly contradictory statement is given that, upon closer examination, reveals a compelling truth. Lo
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!