Answer:
True<em> </em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em><em>i</em>
Answer:
Twelve years ago, Barack Obama introduced himself to the American public by way of a speech given at the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, in which he declared, “There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America, an Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” Few of us believed this to be true, but most, if not all of us, longed for it to be. We vested this brash optimist with our hope, a resource that was in scarce supply three years after the September 11th terrorist attacks in a country mired in disastrous military conflicts in two nations. The vision he offered—of national reconciliation beyond partisan bounds, of government rooted in respect for the governed and the Constitution itself, of idealism that could actually be realized—became the basis for his Presidential campaign. Twice the United States elected to the Presidency a biracial black man whose ancestry and upbringing stretched to three continents.
At various points that idealism has been severely tested. During his Presidency, we witnessed a partisan divide widen into an impassable trench, and gun violence go unchecked while special interests blocked any regulation. The President was forced to show his birth certificate, which we recognized as the racial profiling of the most powerful man in the world. Obama did not, at least publicly, waver in his contention that Americans were bound together by something greater than what divided them. In July, when he spoke in Dallas after a gunman murdered five police officers, he seemed pained by the weight of this faith, as if stress fractures had appeared in a load-bearing wall.
It is difficult not to see the result of this year’s Presidential election as a refutation of Obama’s creed of common Americanism. And on Wednesday, for the first time in the twelve years that we’ve been watching him, Obama did not seem to believe the words he was speaking to the American public. In the White House Rose Garden, Obama offered his version of a concession speech—an acknowledgement of Donald Trump’s victory. The President attempted gamely to cast Trump’s victory as part of the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes, and as an example of the great American tradition of the peaceful transfer of power. (This was not, it should be recalled, the peaceful transfer of power that most observers were worried about.) He intended, he said, to offer the same courtesy toward Trump that President George W. Bush had offered him, in 2008. Yet that reference only served to highlight the paradox of Obama's Presidency: he now exists in history bracketed by the overmatched forty-third President and the misogynistic racial demagogue who will succeed him as the forty-fifth. During his 2008 campaign, Obama frequently found himself—and without much objection on his part—compared to Abraham Lincoln. He may now share an ambivalent common bond with Lincoln, whose Presidency was bookended by James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two lesser lights of American history.
Explanation:
Answer:
The best source to learn more about the geography would be Option B) A detailed atlas of the Pacific Ocean and its islands.
Explanation:
The disappearance of Amelia Earhart and her plane has always been shrouded in mystery. It seems that poor preparation and poor visibility may have led to Amelia Earhart and Noonan running out of fuel about 100 miles off the coast of Howland Island where they were heading. Her last radio transmission was picked up at 7:42 AM on July 2, 1937: "We must be on you, but we cannot see you. Fuel is running low. Been unable to reach you by radio. We are flying at 1,000 feet." Another possibility is that they became plane wrecked on the Nikumaroro reef about 350 miles from Howland Island. Several excursions to the reef have turned up items suggesting someone was on the island like improvised tools and bits of clothing. There was even a bit of Plexiglas that could be from the window. The atlas would help to know the geography of this region.
A source that is a trustworthy authority on a subject is a credible source.
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
In my resources that I have, it says in 1918 that the Texas Woman Suffrage Association won the right to vote in primary election and women began being elected for public offices, meaning they were elected by a party leader. Sorry if this doesn't make sense, but also I had this question wrong and realized what the correct answer is. The correct answer is D.
