<em>The Butterfly Effect</em> is one of the applied models in weather forecasting. It makes us understand that the reliability of forecasting drops considerably after 10 days.
Of course, the butterfly wings cannot cause a big storm, but in some cases, if the actual conditions can be studied it can have an effect, but is very hard to detect.
Professor Lovejoy, from McGill University, comments that "<em>the Butterfly Effect treats the weather as random and uses historical data to force the forecast and reflect a realistic climate"</em>.
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Always. Quadrilaterals are not always parallelograms, but parallelograms are defined as quadrilaterals with two sets of parallel sides.
B is the correct answer
When you vote, that's the best way to "participate" in the democratic system
The following action is an example of the United States using economic influence as a tool of foreign policy:
C. Refusing to trade with a country until it improves its human rights record.
