"Like other settled, agrarian societies in history, those in the Indian subcontinent have been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes raiding from Central Asia. In that sense, the Muslim intrusions and later Muslim invasions were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions during the 1st millennium."
<span>Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia", in </span>Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective<span>, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35–53.</span>"
So, MUSLIMS is the answer, does it have this option?
Radicals are different from liberals in many ways only blinded see through one partisan point of view
The answer would be A) Due process of law was implemented
Answer:
Option: b. tended to have better relations with the Indians.
Explanation:
French had a better relationship with the Native Americans compare to the British in the New World. They maintain a peaceful relationship by signing treaties that helped french traders relying on Native Indians for survival and fur trade. French traders took furs pelts from Native Indians, and in return, gave European goods like metal goods (utensils), textiles, and weapons. French respected the Native Indians and married Native Women, which helped them at the beginning of a good relationship.
