1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
777dan777 [17]
3 years ago
13

How did radicals different from liberals

History
1 answer:
Illusion [34]3 years ago
5 0
Radicals are different from liberals in many ways only blinded see through one partisan point of view
You might be interested in
What is "step 5" of the naturalization process of becoming a citizen?
Lyrx [107]
Im pretty sure its A. get fingerprinted
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In “The Lamb” the speaker’s questions refer to the lamb’s
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

creator     <<<The Creator

5 0
3 years ago
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!<br><br> How was interstate commerce challenged?
podryga [215]

Answer:Hope This Helps

Explanation:

On February 4, 1887, both the Senate and House passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which applied the Constitution’s “Commerce Clause”—granting Congress the power “to Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States”—to regulating railroad rates. Small businesses and farmers were protesting that the railroads charged them higher rates than larger corporations, and that the railroads were also setting higher rates for short hauls than for long-distance hauls. Although the railroads claimed economic justification for policies that favored big businesses, small shippers insisted that the railroads were gouging them.

It took years for Congress to respond to these protests, due to members’ reluctance to have the government interfere in any way with corporate policies. In 1874 legislation was introduced calling for a federal railroad commission. The bill passed the House, but not the Senate. When Congress failed to act, some states adopted their own railroad regulations. Those laws were struck down in 1886, when the Supreme Court ruled in  that the state of Illinois could not restrict the rates that the Wabash Railroad was charging because its freight traffic moved between the states, and only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce. Continued public anger over unfair railroad rates prompted Illinois senator Shelby M. Cullom to hold the hearings that led to the enactment of the Interstate Commerce Act.

That law limited railroads to rates that were “reasonable and just,” forbade rebates to high-volume users, and made it illegal to charge higher rates for shorter hauls. To hear evidence and render decisions on individual cases, the act created the Interstate Commerce Commission. This was the first federal independent regulatory commission, and it served as a model for others that would follow, from the Federal Trade Commission to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Evolving technology eventually made the purpose of the ICC obsolete, and in 1995 Congress abolished the commission, transferring its remaining functions to the Surface Transportation Board. But while the ICC has come and gone, its creation marked a significant turning point in federal policy. Before 1887, Congress had applied the Commerce Clause only on a limited basis, usually to remove barriers that the states tried to impose on interstate trade. The Interstate Commerce Act showed that Congress could apply the Commerce Clause more expansively to national issues if they involved commerce across state lines. After 1887, the national economy grew much more integrated, making almost all commerce interstate and international. The nation rather than the Constitution had changed. That development turned the Commerce Clause into a powerful legislative tool for addressing national problems.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The u.s. senators that refused to participate in the league of nations argued that:
raketka [301]
Tony Riggs: "The plan for the League of Nations was part of the peace treaty that ended World War 1. By law, the United States Senate would have to vote on the treaty. President Wilson believed that the senate would have to approve it if the American people demanded it.
4 0
3 years ago
Which if the following are characteristics of a state
jekas [21]

what are the options

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is Douglass’s conclusion about Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation?
    11·2 answers
  • Explain what the Holocaust was, and why many people in countries outside of Nazi control did not believe it was happening until
    15·1 answer
  • which statement best describes the impact the underlined description has on the meaning of this sentence?
    13·2 answers
  • Was the Vietnam War overwhelmingly popular among American civilians?
    12·1 answer
  • Which was not an accomplishment of Galileo Galilei?
    13·2 answers
  • Texas- Mexico
    8·2 answers
  • What are some modern day examples of how the rights of the constitution are violated
    15·1 answer
  • Three Answers that show What immigrants experienced
    8·1 answer
  • The governing document that sets forth a country's basic rules of government and politics is a ______________________.
    11·1 answer
  • It ensures individual liberty and social enrichment called what?​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!