Answer:
B. $108,000
Explanation:
The computation of the overhead applied is as follows:
= Total actual direct labors cost × overhead rate
= $180,000 × 0.60
= $108,000
Hence, the overhead was applied during August by Ranson Productions is $108,000
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
The computation is shown below:
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
As we know that
a) Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) = Change in consumption ÷ change in disposable income
MPC = $15 billlion ÷ $20 billion
MPC = 0.75
And,
Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) = change in saving ÷change in disposable income
MPS = $5 billion ÷ $20 billion
MPS = 0.25
Now
b) Before the increase in disposable income
The average propensity to consume (APC) is
= Consumption ÷ disposable income
= $150 billion ÷$200 billion
= 0.75
And,
After the increase in the disposable income
New disposable income = $200 billion + $20 billion
= $220 billion
And,
New consumption = $150 billion + $15 billion
= $165 billion
So,
APC = New consumption ÷ new disposable income
= $165 billion ÷ $220 billion
= 0.75
Yes it can be applied.
If an investor is pessimistic that a certain risk that they fear will occur, they avoid investing in the fields prone to the risk.
For example, if an investor is offered an opportunity in the oil and flammable fuels and the persons dreads fire, that person declines the offer no matter how viable it is.
Answer:
HPR = holding period Return is 20%
Explanation:
- Given original Investment = $100
- Short sale proceeds for 1 share = $100
- Investment made of $100 + short sale proceeds of $100 at 5% YTM.
- So Maturity Value = Investment x (1+YTM)^number of years
- = 200 x (1 + 0.05)^1 = 210
- Therefore, In order to cover Short sale of 1 share, we will have to buy 1 share at a closing value of $90
- As such, holding period Return = (Investment proceeds from ZCB - Buying price of stock - Investment amount) / Investment Amount
- = (210 - 90 - 100) / 100 = 0.2 or 20%
- Hence, HPR = holding period Return is 20%
Describing the differences among ethnocentric, polycentric, regiocentric, and geocentric management orientations. We can explain them as follows.
In an ethnocentric management orientation, domestic enterprises or organizations think that their domestic activities or practices within the domestic area influence the domestic market. In this situation, the management teams are frequently transferred from their hometown or place of origin to a new site or a foreign nation.
The approach known as polycentric management orientation is one in which companies and organizations think there is always a distinctive strategy in every global market. This entails hiring and advancing suitable people from the same nation or region that the company works in. It primarily aims to lower hiring costs.
On the other side, the huge multinational firms that tend to construct groups of nations or regions where their branches are located and then develop policies and strategies that would only be relevant in those nations or regions are known as "regiocentric management orientation."
Contrary to the polycentric method, firms and organizations using geocentric management operations hire personnel from all over the world. KFC frequently adopts this stance.
Hence, differences among them have been explained above.
Learn more about Management:
brainly.com/question/1276995
#SPJ4