<span>FDR's experiences as governor of New York prepared him for the presidency by putting in policies that helped the unemployed New Yorkers, cut taxes. Roosevelt's charming qualities made him a great politician.</span>
Answer:
Repetition Priming
Explanation:
In the movie Groundhog Day, Bill Murray's character grows frustrated as he experiences the same day in his life over and over again. With each "passing" day, he is able to respond to people's actions more and more quickly because of REPETITION PRIMING
The statements that are true regarding Soong May-ling, known to the public as Madame Chiang is: Her American education made her an effective diplomat in Chinese-American relations.
<h3>Who is Soong May-ling?</h3>
Soong May-ling who is popularly known as Madame Chiang was the wife of the former president of china who was President Chiang Kai-shek.
Hence, Soong May-ling American education made it possible for her to be an effective diplomat in Chinese-American relations.
Learn more about Soong May-ling or Madame Chiang here:brainly.com/question/4218288
brainly.com/question/26968243
#SPJ1
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
