Answer:
So they can live on something besides water and leaves
Explanation:
<span>the word "science" defines everything around us and
beyond our human imagination. understanding science is always a lot tougher
than other topics and it requires a mind and brain far more sophisticated than
the average level. if one reads a science article, he /she must always look for
author's biases. an author's bias is basically his/her opinions and theory. but
most of the time, science articles always has author's biases to be unbiased
cause it is a factual interpretation. if the author is biased, then the facts
or ideas could be misinterpreting and could lead to some false concepts and
news.</span>
Answer:
Ecological Validity
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this study is lacking in Ecological Validity. This refers to to the extent to which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real-life settings. This is because like mentioned in the question this study is addressing a situation that does not happen in everyday life therefore it cannot be generalized to a real-life settings.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
This is of course a very complicated issue and there are several reasons why this conflict been so difficult to resolve, but the main reason is that both sides are claiming territory that they have both legitimately held.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Whether, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as a person for this purpose. Its effect was to give the southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally, thus allowing the slaveholder interests to largely dominate the government of the United States until 1861. The compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman.
