1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nata [24]
3 years ago
13

Point G is located at (3, −1) and point H is located at (−2, 3). Find y value for the point that is 2 over 3 the distance from p

oint G to point H.

Mathematics
2 answers:
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
7 0
B. 1.67
m : n = 2 : 1
 ( x, y ) = ( (1*3 + 2*(-2))/(2+1) ;  (1 * (-1) + 2 * 3) /(2 + 1) ) =
 = ( (3-4)/3  ; (-1+6)/3 ) 1.67
melamori03 [73]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The answer is \dfrac{5}{3}.

Step-by-step explanation:  Given that the co-ordinates of point G and H are (3, -1) and (-2, 3) respectively.

We are to find the y-value of the point P that is located at two-third distance from point G to point H.

As shown in the attached figure, the ration in which the point P divides the line segment GH is 2 : 1.

Therefore, the co-ordinates of point P will be

\left(\dfrac{2\times (-2)+1\times 3}{2+1},\dfrac{2\times 3+1\times (-1)}{2+1}\right)\\\\\\=\left(\dfrac{-4+3}{3},\dfrac{6-1}{3}\right)\\\\=\left(\dfrac{-1}{3},\dfrac{5}{3}\right).

Thus, the y-value of the point P is \dfrac{5}{3}.

You might be interested in
What is the measure of ∠x?
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

117+x=180°(sum of straight line)

Step-by-step explanation:

x=180-117

x=63

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the value of x when m<2 = x + 64​
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

-9

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangle has two sides that are the same, so it is an isosceles triangle.  Therefore, the base angles are the same.

Angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so:

70 + (x + 64) + (x + 64) = 180

70 + 2x + 128 = 180

2x = -18

x = -9

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What 23.427 rounded to the nearst whole number
photoshop1234 [79]
23, you have to round down. If it was 23.527 it would be 24.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Henrietta solved a rational equation. Her work is shown. How could she solve it in a simpler way?
RoseWind [281]

Henrietta solved a rational equation by multiplying both sides by 3x^{2}(x+2) .She did not find the least common multiple of the denominators .If she had find the least common denominator which is 3x(x+2) then the question can have been simplified in more simpler form.

Henrietta can have got rid of denominator and then use the distributive rule .

So the first option

A:She could use the least common multiple of the denominator is right

4 0
2 years ago
IL MARK AS BRAINLIEST REAL EASY QUESTION‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️
qaws [65]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Don’t know

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • After a busy day of orders, a florist has 6 roses, 7 lilies, 3 carnations, 35 chrysanthemums, 27 sunflowers, 18 violets, and 9 t
    13·1 answer
  • Please help hdhdhdhd
    7·2 answers
  • What is the answer to -4/3p -2/5
    15·1 answer
  • An 11-inch string is cut into 3 equal pieces. which expression shows the length of each piece?
    15·2 answers
  • How many times can you round 72,586
    14·2 answers
  • I need to no the answer to this
    9·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    9·1 answer
  • Pleasee help me!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • How do I simplify? x2 – 4 divided by x2 + 5x + 6. When working with Functions
    5·1 answer
  • Graph the solution set for the inequality x-2/-3 ≤ -5/6
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!