yes
no
nope
depends on the ritual, for example: if it was a pagan ritual I'd be OK with it but if it's a satanic ritual I probably wouldn't be cool with it but I like to keep an open mind
Hi. Unfortunately your question is incomplete. However, when searching for your question on the internet, I was able to find another question very similar to yours that asked to select the sentence where the information "Manufacturers cannot lawfully label their products organic without proof," should be added. If that's the case for you, I hope the answer below will help you.
Answer:
sentence 6
Explanation:
The information "Manufacturers cannot lawfully label their products organic without proof" manages to be coherent after sentence 6, leaving the text fluid, precise and cohesive. Sentence 6 shows that organic products need to be produced with a minimum of chemical products, however, it is necessary to prove that these chemical products were not used in the production process, for the agricultural product to be called organic. Thus, we can agree that the sentence "Manufacturers cannot lawfully label their products organic without proof" extends the meaning of sentence 6 if it is added right after it.
Less dirty. A comparative form of the adjective should not be used if another adjective like less or least is used.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
While many have long believed that Jim Casy embodied Steinbeck's main philosophical beliefs, Tom Joad, completely flawed and human, is the novel's main character. Tom is the character who shows the most development, experiencing what Peter Lisca calls an "education of the heart." This education, gained through experience, intuition, and the teachings of Jim Casy, best exemplifies the moral journey from self to community, from "I" to "we." Tom moves from caring only for himself to a familial loyalty to seeing the entire world as his family.
Tom is kind and often merciful, yet quick to anger and fiercely independent. As a man of action, he embodies one of the novel's main philosophical strands, pragmatism, standing in contrast to the idealistic and talkative Jim Casy. While Casy is predominantly an observer and commentator on the human condition, Tom's acts of humanity are subconscious, his insights and compassion intuitive. Tom is concerned with the practical aspects of his life as they relate to the here and now, not the moral or ideological circumstances surrounding his actions. In this sense, Tom and Casy follow inverted paths in the development of their characters. After Casy has the opportunity to witness his beliefs acted out by the jail inmates, he moves from a position of observation and contemplation to one of action. Tom's social role moves in the opposite direction, from one of action to one of reflection. Not until Tom stops moving and reacting does he have the opportunity to absorb Casy's ideas. When he does so, however, Tom's development comes full-circle as he pledges to return to continue the actions begun by Casy.
Answer:
I support Forster´s opinion in this quotatation.
Explanation:
I would say the same for various reasons: First, a friend is very hard to find, so once you have him/her, you shouldn´t let him/down. In my own experience I´ve had just three or four real friends in my life. They are people I trust, love and care for. Friends are not always together, but you know you can count on them. Sometimes the are near for a period of time, and then they disappear or lose contact for a while and they come back when you need them. I would agree with Forster´s opinion also in the sense that I would hope to have the courage to betray my country.
