-Muhammad Ali modernized Egypt by creating economic reforms, tax collection, landholding, irrigation, cotton production, local industries, and world trade.
-It was a bad thing for Egypt because they’d have to pay it back, Egypt’s economy soon began to decline. The factories stopped producing. Egypt got into serious debt with British banks.
-Bad leadership is one
of them. Ali’s family took over after his death. A second explanation for Egypt’s failure was environmental. They didn’t have as much coal as the Europeans. Egyptian factories moved their machines using animals.
A third explanation is European competition. European countries tried to ruin the Egyptian industry on purpose.
-Some looked for solutions in modernizing, or becoming more like Europeans, while others wanted to return to their Islamic roots. Some Egyptians believed Western-inspired reforms could still function within an Islamic framework, as a kind of middle ground. One scholar, Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, argued that Islam could be modernized and mixed with democracy.
-The most convincing is the environment. European countries were able to produce more coal, which would cause Egypt’s trades to reduce.
I’m not sure what the last answer is, sorry
The discoveries of Donald Johanson are vital to our understanding of
human origins and the development of humans throughout our history. The
skeletons found by Johanson greatly altered the initial perceptions and
set the entire industry on a new route.
The correct answer is letter C
It is the one associated with the words expressed, through written and spoken language;
Defective speech is when communication is not effective;
Speech deformities are organic and functional.
Validation: repeat the said message; ask the person to repeat what was said.
Answer:
Dante Ferris is the best wide receiver in the league.
CJ Ramirez is the worst of these three players.
Explanation:
When stating information about athletes, any statement that is not based on something that can be properly measured and proven can be considered as a biased statement.
Statements regarding who is the best and who is the worst player tend to be mixed with personal opinion/favoritism since there are no clear measurement that can be used to determine it.
