The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
Answer:
"B"
Explanation:
Monolithic organization is an organization that forcefully incorporate all employees into a particular culture being practiced. It can be a very large organization but lack flexibility and its rate of reaction to changes can be very slow.
Its operational system are complicated as resources can be scarce. It believes it can influence employees' motivation, customers, the market and any other complex system.
This description fits into the situation at Teddy's place of work
Answer:
8.99%
Explanation:
For this question we use the PMT function that is presented on the excel spreadsheet. Kindly find it below:
Given that,
Present value = $975
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 9.25% ÷ 2 = 4.625%
NPER = 25 years × 2 = 50 years
The formula is shown below:
= PMT(Rate,NPER,-PV,FV,type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the PMT is $44.96
Now the annual PMT is
= $44.96 × 2
= $89.92
So, the coupon interest rate is
= $89.92 ÷ $1,000
= 8.99%
Creditors are interested in the times interest earned ratio because they want to "<span>have adequate protection against a potential drop in earnings jeopardizing their interest payments".
</span>
The times interest earned ratio is also known as interest coverage ratio, which measures the capacity of an association to pay its obligation commitments. The proportion is generally utilized by banks to discover whether an debt borrower can bear to assume any extra obligation. It might be figured as either EBIT or EBITDA divided by the aggregate interest which is payable.