Answer: sunk costs don't increase as driving increases.
Explanation: sunk costs are irrelevant costs because they have already occured in the past and cannot be avoided. Sunk costs thus do not differ between alternatives, and are unavoidable. The calculation for insurance and other sunk costs are likely not based on the amount of rides the Uber picks up, but rather calculated at a constant rate. So regardless of whether or not the rider pays more or less than the $.50 on the insurance, this will not have any effect on the insurance that is constant and has likely already been paid out.
<span>With the boom of social media, the customer’s path to purchase has
significantly changed. Traditional, “above-the-line” advertising, specifically
done on TV, print or radio is not as effective as it was before when it comes
to convincing consumers to purchase products. More and more people would resort
to seeking advise and referrals from friends in their respective social
networks. Consumers are wiser now given that they know they have the power to get
real-time information and data simply by the act of crowdsourcing. Engaging
with friends from social media networks would give them access to more genuine
feedback or POV on certain products and services. What traditional advertising
lacks is a venue for consumers to get immediate answers to possible questions
they have on products being advertised. Consumers don’t appreciate information
shoved down their throats as they know that marketers have full control of the
messages being communicated in their ads. It’s too one-sided. There should be a
platform for dialogue which is provided by social media. This is where the
fundamental shift of power takes place as described by Mr. Safco. It’s all about engagement and two-way
communication as he puts it. </span>
Answer; True
Explanation;
When a company has excess capacity, it means that potentially it could produce more than it is producing at the moment. As this potential already takes into account the fixed costs, this means that given the fixed costs it currently has, more goods could be produced on those same fixed costs and they wouldn't increase.
Increasing production level would therefore only increase variable costs which rise whenever production rises as they are directly related to the production of goods.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Marta cannot avoid the contract on the basis of a mistake of buying the house because she was supposed to inspect the house she was buying
2. Marta cannot sue Chelene for fraudulent misrepresentation because Chelene was not aware of the condition of the house. The elements in fraudulent misrepresentation are lacking : no intention to deceive, no misrepresentation of material facts
3. It would be Chelene's duty to reveal that there is defect in the house and if not the court would see this as misresprentation.
4. There was no undue influence from Chelene in selling the house and so Marta and Janis even she was alive cannot revoke the contract on this basis
