1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
5

Why do we say that ""mindless"" decision making can actually be more efficient than devoting a lot of thought to what we buy?

Social Studies
1 answer:
nataly862011 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Mindless decisions can cut down time that could be used for something else and overthinking starts to come into the equation as well and we will talk ourselves out of the decision all together.

Explanation:

A decision will become "mindless" if we repeat it often enough to the point where it become a hobbit. This actually could safe you a lot of time compared to putting a lot of thought

For example, let's say that you have to eat breakfast everyday on 7 PM.

If you make a rabbit of eating oatmeal with milk every single day, your body will mindlessly get that exact food every time at 7am. But if you don't you will have to spend a couple of minutes thinking about what breakfast you should eat today .

You might be interested in
7th grade social studies help me pleaseee
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

The United States would not get involved in any European affairs.

Explanation:

The Monroe doctrine said that the United States would not get involved in any European affairs and the United States would not interfere with existing European colonies in the Western Hemisphere. The meaning of this statement is that the United States will remain neutral and can't favour any European country. He wanted to stay away from the European wars and focuses other issues of the country so Monroe doctrine prevents United State's involvement in the war for the betterment of the country.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
?Number 1 hehaisndudiajsnznzbhzhshshshshshshz
barxatty [35]
The answer is b. the state's population
Hope this helped

8 0
3 years ago
__________ refers to the use of personal judgment by police officers, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice system off
Lapatulllka [165]

<u>Discretion</u> refers to the use of personal judgment by police officers, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice system officials regarding whether and how to proceed in a given situation.​

<u>Explanation:</u>

Discretion is the use of personal judgement in criminal cases against offenders. Discretion is viewed as either positively or negatively in case of law. Discretion is practiced at all levels of jurisdiction.

For instance, a judge may use discretion to consider specific evidence or exclude it from trial. Likewise, the police have the power to enforce laws and in some cases are lenient enough to let an offender go. This is where discretion is considered to have a negative impact.

3 0
3 years ago
Since WWII, Japan and the United States have become close political and social allies.
Rom4ik [11]
The answer isn't false, in fact its true.
5 0
3 years ago
5. Briefly compare how the Ottoman and Safavid Empires treated the religious minorities they conquered. Be sure to discuss the O
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Religious minorities were treated as second-rate beings by the Ottoman and Safavid empires. The Janissary system used Christians as the Sultan's bodyguards. The rivalry between Sunni and Shia Muslims was related to who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad.

<h3>What was the Janissary system?</h3>
  • It was a system formed by several armies.
  • It was the system formed by the elite army of the Ottoman sultans.
  • It was the army used to fight Christians.
  • This system led Christians who refused to convert to Islam as the sultan's slaves and bodyguards.

In the Ottoman and Safavid empires, religious minorities were seen as unfit for society. The sultans of these empires forced the people of the conquered areas to adopt the sultan's religion, Islam. Those who refused would be seen as inferior beings and therefore would be enslaved.

These empires witnessed disputes between Shia and Sunni Muslims. These disputes were based on the dispute over who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad. For the Shias, succession should take place within the descendants of the prophet, but for the Sunnis, the people should elect a successor.

Learn more about the Ottoman and Safavid empires:

brainly.com/question/26501400

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the Declaration of Independence, why were the colonists justified in ending their political connections with Great
    15·1 answer
  • How did society Originate​
    8·1 answer
  • People with too much money to spend who become slaves to designer brands are called fashion followers. fashion leaders. fashion
    5·1 answer
  • During the 19th the economics in most Latin American countries relied primarily on the expert of
    5·1 answer
  • What is the Bill of Rights? Who wrote the Bill of Rights? please help!!!
    15·1 answer
  • What’s wrong with this story?
    15·1 answer
  • I will pay someone to hop on my canvas and do ninth grade social studies i really am behind and once it is done i will pay
    9·2 answers
  • Which continent can be found at 40N and 0 longitude?
    6·2 answers
  • Each platform unit shall be installed so that the space between adjacent
    10·1 answer
  • Write a Report writing on Media and Democracy​ pls reply
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!