Answer:
There are generally three main types of immigration in the U.S.:
Family-based immigration.
Employment-based immigration.
Humanitarian immigration.
Explanation:
mark me as a brainlist
The framers did not want any one branch to become despotic and authoritative.
Explanation:
The forerunners of the constitution formulated two-house legislature and the government comprises of three different offices, they are Legislature, executive and judiciary. Each office is conferred with different and various set of responsibilities and the system of supervising and regulating authority.
The representatives declared that no segment of the government administration becomes forceful and persuasive while exercising powers and the each division could keep a discerning eye on the operative methodologies of the other two divisions which would make the whole system unprejudiced and impartial while executing public policies.
Answer:
This was a way to make the Senate resistant to public pressure.
Explanation:
The framers of the constitution and pioneers of the American government divided the senate into three so that they can be up for reelection in two, four, and six years intervals. Their intention in allowing senators to remain in the house for slightly longer terms in office was to make the Senate a stabilized body who could take responsibility for their decisions, and who could make decisions that were independent of public opinion and pressure.
The Senate was also formed to provide the needed adjustments to the legislation made by the House of Representatives.
Julius Caesar thought it would be appropriate for January, Janus's namesake month
Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
